Causality indices for bivariate time series data: A comparative review of performance
Tom Edinburgh1, Stephen J Eglen1, Ari Ercole2
1Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom.
Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|September 2, 2021
Summary
Identifying causal relationships in complex data is hard. Transfer entropy and nonlinear Granger causality show strong, robust performance for bivariate time series analysis, even with imperfect data.
Area of Science:
- Causal inference
- Time series analysis
- Complex systems
Background:
- Inferring nonlinear, asymmetric causal links in multivariate longitudinal data is challenging.
- Existing causality definitions for time series data lack a unified approach.
- Applications span clinical medicine, biology, economics, and environmental science.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate ten prominent causality indices for bivariate time series.
- Assess method performance across diverse simulated dynamic systems.
- Identify robust methods for real-world causal inference.
Main Methods:
- Simulated four distinct bivariate time series models with varying coupling.
- Computed pairwise correlations between ten causality indices.
- Tested method invariance to data transformations (missing data, noise, scaling).
Main Results:
- Strong agreement observed between most causality methods (median Pearson correlation 0.719).
- Methods showed varying robustness to data imperfections like missing data and noise.
- Transfer entropy and nonlinear Granger causality demonstrated superior performance and robustness.
Conclusions:
- Transfer entropy and nonlinear Granger causality are recommended for bivariate causal inference.
- These methods are robust to common real-world data issues, including 20% missing data.
- Open-access Python code is provided for reproducibility and application.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
799
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
799
Causality in Epidemiology
1.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
624
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
624
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
351
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
351
Correlation and Causation
40.1K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
40.1K
Correlation of Experimental Data
342
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
342


