Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

A CO2 Concentration Gradient Facility for Testing CO2 Enrichment and Soil Effects on Grassland Ecosystem Function
Published on: November 21, 2015
From scientific arguments to scepticism: Humans' place in the Greenhouse
1University of East Anglia, UK.
Abstract:
This article investigates the different roles attributed to humanity in the climate change debate, through the depiction of the greenhouse effect. Our hypothesis is that the stance associated with different genres will not only demonstrate different conceptualisations of the greenhouse effect but also convey different views on humans' capacity (or lack of capacity) to mitigate climate change. The corpus under study is composed of texts pertaining to three genres which display particular viewpoints: scientific papers present a documented view on the phenomenon, online forum discussions present exchanges between users who endorse or question particular characteristics of the Greenhouse, and sceptical newspaper articles explicitly deny the existence of an anthropogenic phenomenon. Through a corpus-based, cognitive and pragmatic analysis of the metaphorical expression greenhouse effect, the research shows that humans' place(s) in the Greenhouse is a significant part of environmental argumentative strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Biodiversity and Human Values
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Radiation: Applications
The average...

