Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

10.2K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
10.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.6K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.6K
Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

3.4K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
3.4K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

314
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
314
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

5.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery of the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Inhibitor <b>CC-90001</b>.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2021
Same author

A pan-cancer transcriptome analysis identifies replication fork and innate immunity genes as modifiers of response to the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib.

Oncotarget·2020
Same author

Translational Framework Predicting Tumour Response in Gemcitabine-Treated Patients with Advanced Pancreatic and Ovarian Cancer from Xenograft Studies.

The AAPS journal·2019
Same author

Broad Spectrum Activity of the Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor Prexasertib as a Single Agent or Chemopotentiator Across a Range of Preclinical Pediatric Tumor Models.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2018
Same author

Aurora A Kinase Inhibition Is Synthetic Lethal with Loss of the <i>RB1</i> Tumor Suppressor Gene.

Cancer discovery·2018
Same author

Characterization of a novel AICARFT inhibitor which potently elevates ZMP and has anti-tumor activity in murine models.

Scientific reports·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

39.4K

Addressing Unusual Assay Variability with Robust Statistics.

Jason Haelewyn1, Philip W Iversen2, Jeffrey R Weidner3

  • 1Bristol Meyers Squib, San Diego, CA, USA.

SLAS Discovery : Advancing Life Sciences R & D
|September 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Robust statistical methods offer better bioassay data analysis when standard methods fail due to high variability. These techniques aid in assay optimization and interpretation, even for challenging biological processes.

Keywords:
bioassaydata analysisrobust statistics

More Related Videos

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.4K
Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions
08:23

Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions

Published on: September 25, 2018

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

39.4K
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.4K
Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions
08:23

Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions

Published on: September 25, 2018

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Assay Development

Background:

  • Standard statistical analyses for in vitro bioassays assume normally distributed data.
  • High variability in bioassay data can violate these assumptions, complicating analysis.
  • Such variability may occur during assay optimization or when examining complex biological processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on using robust statistical methods for bioassay data analysis.
  • To present robust methods as an alternative to standard techniques when data exhibit high variability.
  • To discuss the implications of robust methods on experimental design and data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of robust statistical methodologies applicable to bioassay data.
  • Comparison of robust methods with standard statistical approaches.
  • Discussion of practical considerations for implementing robust statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • Robust statistical methods can effectively handle bioassay data with high variability.
  • These methods offer a viable alternative when standard analyses are inappropriate.
  • Application of robust methods can improve assay optimization and data interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Robust statistical methods are valuable tools for analyzing high-variability bioassay data.
  • Their use can enhance the reliability of results and inform assay development.
  • Proper application requires consideration of experimental design and interpretation nuances.