Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

14.6K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
14.6K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

83.0K
Scientific Laws
83.0K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

252.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
252.3K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

213
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
213
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.9K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.9K
Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

9.6K
Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...
9.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knowledge brokers at the science-policy interface: Insights from biosecurity and environmental management.

Ambio·2025
Same author

Examining self-described policy-relevant evidence base for policymaking: an evidence map of COVID-19 literature.

BMJ public health·2025
Same author

A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Science-policy research collaborations need philosophers.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Empty space and the (positive) cosmological constant.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2023
Same author

Not so fast with fast funding.

Accountability in research·2022
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Echoes of Georgescu-Roegen's thermodynamic view in Latin American development debates.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K

Priority and privilege in scientific discovery.

Hannah Rubin1, Mike D Schneider2

  • 1University of Notre Dame, 100 Malloy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United states.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|September 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The priority rule in science, intended to reward contributions, may create disadvantages in diverse scientific fields. It can also lead to suboptimal distribution of research efforts, impacting scientific progress.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.2K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.2K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Sociology of Science
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Research Policy

Background:

  • The priority rule is a key mechanism for regulating scientific behavior and distributing intellectual labor.
  • It is often viewed as a fair system for rewarding scientific contributions within society's broader reward structure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the formal framework used to model the priority rule in science.
  • To investigate how the social dynamics of credit attribution influence the rule's function and impact.
  • To assess the priority rule's effects on socially diverse scientific communities and intellectual labor distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the formal framework for modeling the priority rule.
  • Examination of social dynamics related to credit attribution in science.
  • Theoretical modeling of the priority rule's impact on diverse scientific fields and research distribution.

Main Results:

  • The current formal models of the priority rule oversimplify credit attribution, leading to flawed conclusions about its function.
  • The priority rule can create structural disadvantages, particularly in socially diverse scientific environments.
  • The rule may divert intellectual labor away from optimal research directions.

Conclusions:

  • The idealized formal framework for the priority rule fails to capture crucial aspects of credit attribution.
  • The priority rule's application can inadvertently hinder diversity and equitable reward in science.
  • Re-evaluation of the priority rule is necessary to ensure optimal functioning and fair credit distribution in scientific communities.