Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
Survival Analysis in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech and Agrammatic Aphasia
Jennifer L Whitwell1, Peter Martin1, Joseph R Duffy1
1Department of Radiology (JLW), Department of Health Sciences Research (PM), Division of Speech Pathology (JRD, HMC, RLU, EAS), and Division of Behavioral Neurology (HB, KAJ), Department of Neurology, and Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (MMM), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Objective:
To compare survival among patients with different combinations of apraxia of speech (AOS) and agrammatic aphasia, including those with isolated AOS (primary progressive AOS, PPAOS), both AOS and agrammatic aphasia (AOS + progressive agrammatic aphasia [PAA]), and isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA).
Methods:
One hundred nine patients were recruited who had any combination of AOS and agrammatic aphasia (42 PPAOS, 56 AOS + PAA, and 11 PAA) and were followed longitudinally, with 57 patients having since died. Cox proportional hazard models were used to quantify the relative risk of death across diagnoses. Adjusted survival curves are presented based on this model. We also assessed the influence of AOS and aphasia severity on survival.
Results:
PPAOS had the longest survival (median survival of 5.97 years from the baseline visit), followed by PAA (5.26 years) and then AOS + PAA (4.33 years). AOS + PAA had a greater risk of death than PPAOS, with a hazard ratio of 3.01 (lower/upper confidence interval = 1.66/5.46, p < 0.001). Risk of death did not differ between PAA and the other groups. All results accounted for age and time from onset to baseline visit. AOS severity, independent of syndromic diagnosis, was associated with greater risk of death, with a hazard ratio of 1.35 for a 1-point increase in severity. Aphasia severity was not associated with risk of death.
Conclusions:
Individuals with PPAOS have better survival and reduced risk of death compared with individuals with AOS + PAA. This finding will help improve prognostic estimates for these patients and supports the value of distinguishing PPAOS from AOS + PAA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

