[Psychometric validation of Convergence criteria PP]
V Quistrebert-Davanne1, J-B Hardouin2, T Riant3
1Centre fédératif de pelvipérinéologie et clinique urologique, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Summary
The PP Convergences (CPP) criteria effectively screen for pelvic sensitization in chronic pelvic pain patients. A score of 5 or higher identifies patients with pelvic sensitization, with high sensitivity and specificity.
Area of Science:
- Pain Medicine
- Clinical Evaluation
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The PP Convergences (CPP) criteria comprise 10 expert-consensus clinical indicators for identifying sensitization in chronic pelvic pain.
- These criteria are the sole existing clinical guide for detecting pelvic sensitization in patients with pelvic perineal pain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To psychometrically validate the CPP criteria for reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
- To establish a screening score for pelvic-perineal pain sensitization using the CPP criteria.
- To identify combinations of CPP criteria that predict pelvic sensitization.
Main Methods:
- 308 patients with pelviperineal pain were recruited.
- Fifteen expert physicians assessed the presence of 10 CPP criteria and diagnosed pelvic sensitization.
- Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed.
Main Results:
- A score of 5 on the CPP criteria demonstrated high accuracy (95% sensitivity, 87% specificity).
- The CPP criteria collectively showed excellent sensitivity (97%) and specificity (91%) with good reproducibility (Kappa > 0.6).
- Criterion Q8 (pain post-sexual activity) was the most significant predictor of sensitization.
Conclusions:
- The CPP criteria serve as a highly effective screening tool for pelvic sensitization.
- A CPP score of 5 or greater reliably indicates pelvic sensitization in patients.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
617
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
617
Data Validation
314
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
314
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
4.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
4.0K
Goodness-of-Fit Test
5.7K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
5.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
3.3K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
3.3K


