Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Transcatheter closure for postinfarction ventricular septal defect: A meta-analysis of the current evidence
Xiang Yang1,2, Zeran Yu3, Yu Wang4
1Department of Obsterics Ultrasound, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650034, China.
Objective:
Postinfarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is a severe complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Transcatheter closure (TCC) is an alternative option to surgical repair. This study was undertaken to examine the published literature to provide objective evidence for TCC using a meta-analysis.
Methods:
We searched for significant medical and publisher databases. Two reviewers checked the quality of the studies and extracted data. Eligible studies included single-arm studies and comparative studies. Weighted means, pooled event rates, efficacy outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for immediate shunt reduction (ISR), presence of cardiogenic shock (CS), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV, time from AMI to ventricular septal defect (VSD), and time to VSD closure was estimated.
Results:
A total of 27 single-arm articles (462 patients) were included. The pooled event rate was 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.772-1.021) for successful device implantation, 80.9% (95% CI: 0.645-0.972) for ISR, 31.5% (95% CI: 0.149-0.482) for 30-day mortality, and 25.3% (95% CI: 0.072-0.434) for 30-day mortality of primary closure at the acute phase. CS (OR = 3.607, 95% CI: 2.301-5.653), NYHA class IV (OR = 6.491, 95% CI: 1.444-29.188) and time to VSD closure were risk predictors for TCC. There was no correlation between defect size (OR = 2.592, 95% CI: 0.380-17.661) and mortality.
Conclusion:
TCC should be a relatively safe and minimally invasive method for PIVSD, with an excellent successful device implantation rate and acceptable low 30-day mortality. The procedure appears promising, but its safety and efficacy could only be demonstrated by randomized controlled trials. Therefore, the mortality of data comparing surgery to TCC compels the need for future comparative trials.

