Pharmacodynamic measures within tumors expose differential activity of PD(L)-1 antibody therapeutics

Dhiraj Kumar1, Akhilesh Mishra1,2, Ala Lisok1

  • 1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.

Insights

Measuring accessible programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels using PET imaging reveals differences in monoclonal antibody (mAb) pharmacodynamics, aiding the understanding of cancer immunotherapy effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Radiochemistry

Background:

  • Large monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) often show poor tumor penetration, limiting drug exposure and treatment response.
  • Quantitative tools to assess mAb activity within tumors are lacking, hindering drug development and comparison.
  • Understanding mAb pharmacodynamics is crucial for optimizing cancer immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop quantitative tools for assessing mAb pharmacologic activity within tumors.
  • To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1).
  • To compare the activity of different anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 mAbs using target engagement measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel fluorine-18-labeled PET imaging agent ([18F]DK222) for PD-L1 quantification.
  • Utilizing positron emission tomography (PET) to measure accessible PD-L1 levels in preclinical tumor models during mAb treatment.
  • Application of mixed-effects models to analyze pharmacodynamic data and assess target engagement.

Main Results:

  • The PET imaging agent [18F]DK222 provided high-contrast images for PD-L1 quantification.
  • Subtle differences in pharmacodynamic effects were observed between two anti-PD-1 mAbs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab).
  • Starkly divergent PD-L1 target engagement was observed with different anti-PD-L1 mAbs (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) at equivalent doses, correlating with tumor growth effects.

Conclusions:

  • Measuring PD-L1 pharmacodynamics using PET imaging provides mechanistic insights into the activity of therapeutic mAbs targeting PD-1/PD-L1.
  • This quantitative approach elucidates mAb pharmacologic activity irrespective of biophysical properties and accounts for physiological heterogeneity.
  • The findings highlight the value of target pharmacodynamics assessment for optimizing cancer immunotherapies.