Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

4.1K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome.

Nature·2026
Same author

Obsessive-compulsive disorder and abstract sequence task contributions shift prefrontal cortical connectivity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Visual Simulation Is Supported by Sequential Monitoring in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Cognitive sequences in obsessive-compulsive disorder are supported by frontal cortex ramping activity.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Anti-diuretic hormone ITP signals via a guanylate cyclase receptor to modulate systemic homeostasis in <i>Drosophila</i>.

eLife·2025
Same author

The human cerebellum encodes temporally sensitive reinforcement learning signals.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.7K

Abstract sequential task control is facilitated by practice and embedded motor sequences.

Juliana E Trach1, Theresa H McKim2, Theresa M Desrochers2

  • 1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Practice improves performance in abstract task sequences, revealing a mixed hierarchy model. This research clarifies how practice and motor processing impact efficient task execution in daily life.

More Related Videos

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.7K
Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.7K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.7K
Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Everyday tasks exhibit hierarchical structures, from overarching goals to motor actions.
  • The nature of hierarchical influence (strict vs. flexible) and practice effects on higher levels remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hierarchical structure of task sequences and the impact of practice.
  • To determine if practice affects performance at superordinate levels of task sequences.
  • To explore the interplay between abstract goals, subgoals, and motor actions in task execution.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an abstract, nonmotor task sequence paradigm with memorized sequences.
  • Manipulated practice at goal and motor action levels across three experiments.
  • Included sequences with and without embedded motor response components.

Main Results:

  • Practice enhanced performance and reduced control costs for both abstract task sequences and subordinate tasks.
  • Demonstrated a strict hierarchy between abstract goals and subgoals, and a nonstrict relationship between subgoals and motor responses.
  • Observed nonstrict influence from motor responses to abstract task levels under certain conditions, independent of integrated representations.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence supports a mixed hierarchical model for task sequences, integrating strict and nonstrict influences.
  • Practice differentially affects hierarchical levels, impacting both abstract goals and motor execution.
  • Findings offer insights into optimizing task execution through understanding practice and motor processing roles.