Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Preterm EEG: A Multimodal Neurophysiological Protocol
Published on: February 18, 2012
Are we enrolling representative cohorts of premature infants in our clinical trials?
Adithya Shastry1, Barbara Bajuk2, Mohamed E Abdel-Latif3,4,5
1Medical School, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Insights
Infants eligible but not enrolled in The Australian Placental Transfusion Study (APTS) faced higher risks of mortality and morbidity. Retrospective consent may improve trial generalizability in neonatal research.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Clinical trial methodology
- Perinatal medicine
Background:
- The Australian Placental Transfusion Study (APTS) aimed to evaluate placental transfusion in infants.
- Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of infants eligible but not enrolled (ENE) is crucial for trial generalizability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes between infants eligible and enrolled (EE) versus eligible but not enrolled (ENE) in the APTS.
- To assess the impact of antenatal consenting on population representation in neonatal clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study design.
- Involved a population-based, multicentre analysis of APTS participants.
- Compared anthropometric measures, prematurity, and clinical outcomes between EE and ENE infant groups.
Main Results:
- Significantly higher prematurity observed in ENE infants (mean gestation 27.0 weeks) compared to EE infants (28.0 weeks).
- ENE infants exhibited increased incidences of low Apgar scores, chronic lung disease (CLD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) requiring treatment.
- Multivariate analysis indicated a greater risk of mortality for ENE infants (OR 1.86; 95% CI, 1.30-2.67).
Conclusions:
- Antenatal consenting for clinical trials can introduce bias in population representation, potentially limiting the generalizability of results.
- Implementing retrospective consent or waiver of consent procedures may enhance the generalizability of findings in neonatal and emergency clinical trials.
Objective:
To compare the difference in outcomes in a subset population of infants "eligible but not enrolled; ENE" vs those who were "eligible and enrolled, EE" in The Australian Placental Transfusion Study (APTS).
Study Design:
Population-based multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Results:
A total of 535 (17.7%) infants were categorized as EE and 2489 (82.3%) ENE. ENE infants were significantly more premature (mean gestation 27.0 vs 28.0 weeks) but otherwise of similar anthropometric measures compared to EE infants. ENE infants had significantly higher incidences of low Apgar scores <7 at 5 min, CLD, IVH and PDA requiring treatment. Using a multivariate adjusted-analysis, ENE were at a greater risk for mortality (OR 1.86; 95% CI, 1.30-2.67, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Antenatal consenting may lead to biased population representation, which may affect trial results' generalizability. Retrospective consent or waiver of consent may improve the generalizability of neonatal and emergency clinical trials.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...