Are current tissue-based selenium guidelines and criteria overly protective of freshwater fish populations? A...

Several decades after selenium impacts on wild fish populations were observed in freshwater reservoirs receiving fly ash effluents from electric power facilities at Belews Lake and Hyco Reservoir (North Carolina, USA), developments in selenium (Se) toxicology have led to a greater understanding of Se effects on freshwater fish. These latter advancements have allowed regulatory agencies in several jurisdictions to develop tissue-based toxicity benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life. These benchmarks were generally derived from datasets encompassing multiple fish species and designed to protect the most sensitive species (US Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] water quality criteria). Safety factors have been applied in the development of some Canadian guidelines (British Columbia [BC]), resulting in guidelines that appear to be overly conservative. The present study addresses the question, "Are current tissue-based selenium guidelines and criteria overly protective of freshwater fish populations?" A literature review was conducted of studies in which Se was the primary constituent of concern, to compare tissue concentrations and results of fish population metrics and deformity assessment studies with current regulatory thresholds for the protection of aquatic life in the United States and Canada. EPA fish tissue-based Se criteria were found to be protective of fish populations and, at times, overly protective. Canadian water quality guidelines for Se (BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy [BCMOECCS], Environment and Climate Change Canada [ECCC]) were consistently found to be overly protective, especially for benchmarks in which safety factors were used to derive those guidelines. In addition to a synthesis of the results of these studies, various limitations of the reviewed studies are discussed, and recommendations for future studies are proposed. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:622-630. © 2021 SETAC.