Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025
Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Accuracy and applicability of non-invasive evaluation of aortic wave intensity using only pressure waveforms in
Arian Aghilinejad1, Faisal Amlani1, Jing Liu1
1Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Abstract:
Background.Wave intensity (WI) analysis is a well-established method for quantifying the energy carried in arterial waves, providing valuable clinical information about cardiovascular function. The primary drawback of this method is the need for concurrent measurements of both pressure and flow waveforms.Objective. We have for the first time investigated the accuracy of a novel methodology for estimating wave intensity employing only single pressure waveform measurements; we studied both carotid- and radial-based estimations in a large heterogeneous cohort.Approach.Tonometry was performed alongside Doppler ultrasound to acquire measurements of both carotid and radial pressure waveforms as well as aortic flow waveforms in 2640 healthy and diseased participants (1439 female) in the Framingham Heart Study. Patterns consisting of two forward waves (Wf1, Wf2) and one backward wave (Wb1) along with reflection metrics were compared with those obtained from exact WI analysis.Main Results. Carotid-based estimates correlated well for forward peak amplitudes (Wf1,r = 0.85,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.72,p < 0.05) and peak time (Wf1,r = 0.94,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.98,p < 0.05), and radial-based estimates correlated fairly to poorly for amplitudes (Wf1,r = 0.62,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.42,p < 0.05) and peak time (Wf1,r = 0.04,p = 0.10; Wf2,r = 0.75,p < 0.05). In all cases, estimated Wb1 measures were not correlated. Reflection metrics were well correlated for healthy patients (r = 0.67,p < 0.05), moderately correlated for valvular disease (r = 0.59,p < 0.05) and fairly correlated for CVD (r = 0.46,p < 0.05) and heart failure (r = 0.49,p < 0.05).Significance. These findings indicate that pressure-only WI produces accurate results only when forward contributions are of primary interest and only for carotid pressure waveforms. The pressure-only WI estimations of this work provide an important opportunity to further the goal of uncovering clinical insights through wave analysis affordably and non-invasively.
Related Concept Videos
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:21Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
01:23Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
01:17Measurement of Blood Pressure