Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

9.8K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.8K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

3.9K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

204
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
204
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

30
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
30
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

22
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
22
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

300
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
300

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a Core Outcome Measurement Set for Adult ICU Patients, the CoreMS-ICU-A Protocol.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Restraint Status Influences Fracture Phenotypes and Operative Management in Pediatric MVC-Related Facial Trauma.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Sodium Bicarbonate for Critically Ill Adults with Metabolic Acidosis and Shock.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluating Environmental Ward Performance: Insights From Acoustic, Lighting, and Temperature Monitoring in a Palliative Care Unit.

HERD·2026
Same author

Conservative Oxygen for Unresponsive Patients after Cardiac Arrest.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Mechanisms Matter: Intentional Injury and Its Impact on Pediatric Facial Fractures.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a mixed method process evaluation in a randomised controlled trial, VenUS6.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Cheek acupuncture for enhancing postoperative recovery after endoscopic sinus surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Methodological guidance for incorporating lived experience in the early stages of core outcome set development: a scoping review.

Trials·2026
Same journal

IMPACT-Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial: perioperative mycotic prophylaxis with fluconazole to reduce postoperative complications following cystectomy-study protocol for a national multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

A cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a quality cluster-based intervention on the use of prostate-specific antigen test in general practice-a study protocol.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive optical and magnetic stimulation for venous and mixed etiology leg ulcers: protocol for the NAZARÉ multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.5K

Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice.

Tom Briffa1, Tanya Symons2, Nikolajs Zeps3

  • 1University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Trials
|September 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparative effectiveness trials (CETs) generate crucial real-world evidence for healthcare decisions. This paper identifies barriers to conducting CETs and proposes solutions to integrate them into learning healthcare systems.

Keywords:
Clinical careComparative effectivenessEmbedHigh-quality evidencePragmaticTrials

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

812

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.5K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

812

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Contemporary clinical practice guidelines often lack robust evidence, causing treatment uncertainty and practice variation.
  • Comparative effectiveness trials (CETs) compare approved interventions to generate high-quality, real-world evidence for decision-making.
  • CETs are vital for optimizing health outcomes and addressing patient and health system priorities.

Discussion:

  • Implementation challenges hinder the widespread adoption and execution of CETs in healthcare.
  • Identifying and addressing these barriers is crucial for improving the quality of clinical evidence.
  • Normalizing CETs requires a systematic approach within the healthcare environment.

Key Insights:

  • Lack of high-quality evidence leads to variability in medical practices.
  • CETs offer a solution by comparing existing treatments to inform clinical decisions.
  • Overcoming implementation hurdles is essential for leveraging CETs' full potential.

Outlook:

  • Integrating CETs into a learning healthcare system framework can enhance evidence generation.
  • Future research should focus on practical strategies to overcome identified barriers.
  • Standardizing CET conduct will lead to more reliable evidence for clinical practice guidelines.