Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025
07:37
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
9.3K
Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals
Barry A Hong1, Elizabeth D Cash2, Barbara A Cubic3
1Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8134, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093, USA. hongb@wustl.edu.
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
|September 18, 2021
Summary
Becoming a peer reviewer is a rewarding experience that upholds scientific standards in psychology. While initially intimidating for new reviewers, seasoned experts share their collective wisdom on this universal academic task.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Academic Publishing
- Scientific Peer Review
Background:
- Peer review is a fundamental aspect of academic publishing, essential for maintaining the integrity and quality of scientific literature.
- Serving as a reviewer is often considered an honor and a rewarding professional experience for academics.
- The role of a reviewer integrates scientific values and clinical skills, aligning with the scientist-practitioner model in psychology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the experiences and perspectives of seasoned journal reviewers in the field of psychology.
- To provide insights and guidance for both new and experienced peer reviewers.
- To highlight the significance of peer review in the advancement of psychological science.
Main Methods:
- The study employs an interview-based approach.
- Three experienced journal reviewers were interviewed.
- Their collective wisdom and knowledge regarding the peer review process were gathered and reflected upon.
Main Results:
- Peer review is a universally practiced and highly personal activity within academic psychology.
- While potentially intimidating for novices, the experience is generally viewed as rewarding and crucial for scientific progress.
- Seasoned reviewers offer valuable insights into navigating the complexities and responsibilities of the role.
Conclusions:
- The peer review process, though challenging for inexperienced individuals, is vital for upholding scientific standards and fostering the growth of psychological literature.
- Sharing the experiences of seasoned reviewers can demystify the process and encourage greater participation.
- Effective peer review strengthens the scientist-practitioner model by integrating research and clinical expertise.
