Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Long-term outcomes in patients treated with flecainide for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary artery disease
Tyson S Burnham1, Heidi T May2, Tami L Bair2
1Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Insights
Flecainide showed a favorable safety profile for atrial fibrillation patients with stable coronary artery disease, with lower mortality and adverse events compared to class-3 antiarrhythmic drugs. Further trials are needed to confirm these findings for flecainide use in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) carry risks for ventricular arrhythmias post-myocardial infarction.
- Guidelines advise against 1C AADs in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Long-term data on 1C AADs for atrial fibrillation (AF) in CAD patients without prior myocardial infarction are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flecainide versus class-3 AADs in AF patients with stable CAD.
- To compare outcomes including mortality, heart failure hospitalization, ventricular tachycardia, and MACE at 3 years.
Main Methods:
- Two patient populations were analyzed from 24,315 patients initiating AADs.
- Population 1: Propensity-matched AF patients with CAD (flecainide vs. class-3 AAD).
- Population 2: AF patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft (flecainide vs. class-3 AAD).
Main Results:
- In population 1, flecainide was associated with significantly lower 3-year rates of mortality, HF hospitalization, MACE, and VT compared to class-3 AADs.
- In population 2, flecainide showed numerically lower adverse event rates, though not statistically significant.
- Specific 3-year outcomes for population 1: mortality (9.1% vs 19.3%), HF hospitalization (12.5% vs 18.3%), MACE (22.9% vs 36.6%), VT (5.8% vs 8.5%).
Conclusions:
- Flecainide demonstrates a favorable safety profile compared to class-3 AADs in select AF patients with stable CAD.
- Current guideline exclusions for flecainide in this patient group may warrant re-evaluation.
- Prospective trials are recommended to confirm flecainide's safety and efficacy in AF patients with CAD.
Background:
Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) have been associated with harm in patients treated for ventricular arrhythmias with a prior myocardial infarction. Consensus guidelines have advocated that these drugs not be used in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, long-term data are lacking to know if unique risks exist when these drugs are used for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with CAD without a prior myocardial infarction.
Methods:
In 24,315 patients treated with the initiation of AADs, two populations were evaluated: (1) propensity-matched AF patients with CAD were created based upon AAD class (flecainide, n = 1,114, vs class-3 AAD, n = 1,114) and (2) AF patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft (flecainide, n = 150, and class-3 AAD, n = 1,453). Outcomes at 3 years for mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and MACE were compared between the groups.
Results:
At 3 years, mortality (9.1% vs 19.3%, P < .0001), HF hospitalization (12.5% vs 18.3%, P < .0001), MACE (22.9% vs 36.6%, P < .0001), and VT (5.8% vs 8.5%, P = .02) rates were significantly lower in the flecainide group for population 1. In population 2, adverse event rates were also lower, although not significantly, in the flecainide compared to the class-3 AAD group for mortality (20.9% vs 25.8%, P = .26), HF hospitalization (24.5% vs 26.1%, P = .73), VT (10.9% vs 14.7%, P = .28) and MACE (44.5% vs 49.5%, P = .32).
Conclusions:
Flecainide in select patients with stable CAD for AF has a favorable safety profile compared to class-3 AADs. These data suggest the need for prospective trials of flecainide in AF patients with CAD to determine if the current guideline-recommended exclusion is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

