Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Biomechanical comparison among five mid/hindfoot arthrodeses procedures in treating flatfoot using a musculoskeletal
Yinghu Peng1, Wenxin Niu2, Duo Wai-Chi Wong1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China; Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China.
Background And Objective:
Mid/hindfoot arthrodesis could modify the misalignment of adult-acquired flatfoot and attenuate pain. However, the long-term biomechanical effects of these surgical procedures remain unclear, and the quantitative evidence is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate and quantify the influences of five mid/hindfoot arthrodeses on the internal foot biomechanics during walking stance.
Methods:
A young participant with flexible flatfoot was recruited for this study. We reconstructed a subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody driven-finite element (FE) foot model based on the foot magnetic resonance imaging. The severe flatfoot model was developed from the flexible flatfoot through the attenuation of ligaments and the unloading of the posterior tibial muscle. The five mid/hindfoot arthrodeses simulations (subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, double, and triple arthrodeses) and a control condition (no arthrodesis) were performed simultaneously in the detailed foot multibody dynamics model and FE model. Muscle forces calculated by a detailed multi-segment foot model and ground reaction force were used to drive the foot FE model. The internal foot loadings were compared among control and these arthrodeses conditions at the first and second vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) peak and VGRF valley instants.
Results:
The results indicated that the navicular heights in double and triple arthrodeses were higher than other surgical procedures, while the subtalar arthrodesis had the smallest values. Five mid/hindfoot arthrodeses reduced the peak plantar fascia stress compared to control. However, double and triple arthrodeses increased the peak medial cuneo-navicular joint contact pressures and peak foot pressures as well as the metatarsal bones stresses.
Conclusion:
Although mid/hindfoot arthrodesis generally reduced the collapse of medial longitudinal arch and plantar fascia loading during the stance phase, the increased loading in the adjacent unfused joint and metatarsal bones for double and triple arthrodeses should be noted. These findings could account for some symptoms experienced by flatfoot patients after surgery, which may facilitate the optimization of surgical protocols.
