Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025
Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
Published on: March 3, 2023
Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses
S Gatt1, J L Portelli1, F Zarb1
1Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Introduction:
This study aims to identify optimal exposure parameters, delivering the lowest radiation dose while maintaining images of diagnostic quality for the antero-posterior (AP) abdomen x-ray projection in large patients with an AP abdominal diameter of >22.3 cm.
Methodology:
The study was composed of two phases. In phase 1, an anthropomorphic phantom (20 cm AP abdominal diameter) was repetitively radiographed while adding 3 layers (5 cm thick each) of fat onto the phantom reaching a maximum AP abdominal diameter of 35 cm. For every 5 cm thickness, images were taken at 10 kVp (kilovoltage peak) intervals, starting from 80 kVp as the standard protocol currently in use at the local medical imaging department, to 120 kVp in combination with the use of automatic exposure control (AEC). The dose area product (DAP), milliampere-second (mAs) delivered by the AEC, and measurements to calculate the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were recorded. Phase 2 included image quality evaluation of the resultant images by radiographers and radiologists through absolute visual grading analysis (VGA). The resultant VGA scores were analysed using visual grading characteristics (VGC) curves.
Results:
The optimal kVp setting for AP abdominal diameters at: 20 cm, 25 cm and 30 cm was found to be 110 kVp increased from 80 kVp as the standard protocol (with a 56.5% decrease in DAP and 76.2% in mAs, a 54.2% decrease in DAP and 76.2% decrease in mAs and a 29.2% decrease in DAP and 59.7% decrease in mAs, respectively). The optimal kVp setting for AP abdominal diameter at 35 cm was found to be 120 kVp increased from 80 kvp as the standard protocol (with a 50.7% decrease in DAP and 73.4% decrease in mAs). All this was achieved while maintaining images of diagnostic quality.
Conclusion:
Tailoring the exposure parameters for large patients in radiography of the abdomen results in a significant reductions in DAP which correlates to lower patient doses while still maintaining diagnostic image quality.
Implications For Clinical Practice:
This research study and resultant parameters may help guide clinical departments to optimise AP abdomen radiographic exposures for large patients in the clinical setting.
