Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
A Bench Evaluation of Eight Home-Care Ventilators
Sara Martínez Castro1, Francisco Javier Belda Nacher2, Carlos Delgado Navarro3
1Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain. saradacuris@hotmail.com aquereparteledicia@gmail.com.
Performance varies significantly among home mechanical ventilators. EOVE and Trilogy Evo showed fewer breathing issues, offering guidance for selecting the best device for patient needs.
Area of Science:
- Respiratory Care
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pulmonary Medicine
Background:
- Increasing use of home mechanical ventilation (HMV) necessitates advanced ventilator technology.
- Limited comparative data exists on HMV performance, leading to manufacturer-dependent choices.
- Current HMV technology rivals intensive care unit (ICU) ventilators in functionality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the technical performance of 8 commercially available HMV devices.
- To identify differences in ventilator function under various simulated physiological conditions.
Main Methods:
- Bench testing of 8 HMV devices (Monnal T50, EOVE EO-150, Puritan Bennet 560, Weinmann, PrismaVent 50, Trilogy Evo, Astral 150, Vivo 60) using an active lung model.
- Testing under 18 conditions combining respiratory mechanics, ventilatory mode, and inspiratory muscle effort.
- Analysis of delivered volume, trigger response, pressurization capacity, and synchronization.
Main Results:
- Significant performance variations observed across the 8 HMV devices.
- Reduced inspiratory muscle effort worsened delivered volume, trigger response, pressurization, and synchronization.
- Higher pressure support increased ventilator-patient asynchronies; EOVE and Trilogy Evo exhibited the fewest.
- All ventilators showed asynchronies under specific conditions.
Conclusions:
- Substantial technical performance variability exists among HMV devices.
- Ventilator-patient asynchronies are a key concern, particularly with high pressure support and low muscle effort.
- Findings aid clinicians in selecting HMV devices tailored to individual patient therapy requirements.
More Related Videos
09:37Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment RMCA in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...