Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.3K
Do Financial Incentives Aimed at Decreasing Interhousehold Inequality Increase Intrahousehold Inequality?
Amanda Chuan1, John List2, Anya Samek3
1Michigan State University School of Human Resources & Labor Relations, 368 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48842.
Summary
Financial incentives for disadvantaged families boost investment in one child but reduce time spent with siblings. This increases intra-household inequality, potentially overstating program benefits.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Developmental Economics
- Sociology
Background:
- Financial incentives can reduce socioeconomic inequality by promoting human capital development in children.
- Understanding intra-household resource allocation is crucial for evaluating such interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how parents allocate their time when receiving financial incentives.
- To examine the impact of financial incentives on parental investment in children and siblings.
Main Methods:
- A field experiment was conducted to observe parental time allocation.
- The study focused on disadvantaged families receiving financial incentives.
Main Results:
- Financial incentives led to increased investment in the target child.
- Parents substituted time from siblings to the target child, increasing intra-household inequality.
- Aggregate program gains were overestimated when only considering the target child.
Conclusions:
- While financial incentives can enhance human capital, they may inadvertently increase intra-household inequality.
- Policy evaluations should consider intra-household dynamics and sibling effects for a comprehensive understanding of program impact.
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
37
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
37
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
598
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
The theory differentiates between...
598
In- and Out-Groups
41.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
41.0K
Close Relationships and Culture
45
Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
45
Inclusive Fitness
36.4K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
36.4K
Halo Effect
62
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
62

