Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

201
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
201
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

500
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
500
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Dementia risk estimation in persons at risk and the predictive turn in Alzheimer's disease-The PreTAD project: Study protocol with an ethical, clinical, linguistic, and legal approach.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2024
Same author

Psychological outcomes of dementia risk estimation in MCI patients: Results from the PreDADQoL project.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
06:42

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.5K

The NRW80+ study: conceptual background and study groups.

Sylvia Hansen1, Roman Kaspar2, Michael Wagner3

  • 1Ceres-Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health, University of Cologne, Albertus Magnus Platz, 50923, Cologne, Germany. sylvia.hansen@uni-koeln.de.

Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie
|September 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quality of life (QoL) in very old individuals is influenced by diverse life courses and societal values. Understanding these differences is key to addressing disparities in well-being among the elderly.

Keywords:
Age groupsCohortQuality of lifeRepresentative surveyVery old age

More Related Videos

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

845
Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:14

Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: March 14, 2025

449

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
06:42

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.5K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

845
Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:14

Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: March 14, 2025

449

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Sociology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Quality of life (QoL) research in the very old often overlooks individual and societal values crucial for successful aging.
  • Empirical data comparing distinct age groups over 80 is scarce due to declining numbers in the oldest age strata.
  • The NRW80+ study addresses this gap by focusing on the quality of life and well-being of individuals aged 80 and above.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a representative assessment of quality of life (QoL) in individuals aged 80 and older in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW80+ study).
  • To explore the influence of individual values and societal norms on successful life conduct in very old age.
  • To enable robust comparisons between different age groups within the oldest populations.

Main Methods:

  • The study surveyed 1863 individuals aged 80+, with older age groups (85-89, 90+) deliberately overrepresented for robust comparison.
  • Proxy interviews were conducted for 176 participants unable to provide direct input due to health reasons.
  • Data collection focused on biographical background, including education, employment, and life event timing, analyzed through the Challenges and Potentials model of QoL in very old age (CHAPO).

Main Results:

  • Significant differences were observed across age groups (80-84, 85-89, 90+) regarding education, employment history, and the timing of major life events like childbirth.
  • The study highlights pronounced variations in life experiences and socioeconomic factors among the very old.
  • These disparities underscore the complex interplay of life course and current living conditions affecting well-being.

Conclusions:

  • Quality of life (QoL) disparities in very old age are significantly shaped by diverse life courses and resultant living conditions.
  • Acknowledging individual life trajectories is essential for a nuanced understanding of well-being in advanced age.
  • Societal values and individual perspectives must be integrated into QoL research for the elderly.