Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces
Published on: September 9, 2022
Interfacial Area Transport Equation for Bubble Coalescence and Breakup: Developments and Comparisons
Huiting Chen1, Shiyu Wei1, Weitian Ding1
1State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Ferrometallurgy, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
This review examines the Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) for modeling bubble coalescence and breakup in multiphase flows. It highlights key mechanisms, constitutive models, and future research directions for improved predictions.
Area of Science:
- Multiphase Flow Dynamics
- Fluid Mechanics
- Chemical Engineering
Background:
- Bubble coalescence and breakup are critical phenomena in various physical-chemical processes.
- The Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) is a key tool for modeling these processes, often treating bubbles in two groups.
- Understanding these interactions is vital for accurately predicting fluid behavior in reactors, pipelines, and other industrial applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive review of IATE models for bubble coalescence and breakup.
- To analyze five distinct bubble interaction mechanisms: random collision, wake entrainment, turbulent impact, shearing-off, and surface instability.
- To identify limitations and suggest future research directions for enhancing IATE's predictive capabilities.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing literature on IATE for bubble dynamics.
- Analysis of one-group and two-group IATE constitutive models.
- Evaluation of bubble interaction mechanisms and their governing parameters.
- Discussion of experimental challenges in interface measurement.
Main Results:
- Bubble size, velocity, and collision frequency are dominant in coalescence.
- Turbulent kinetic energy and inertial force combined form an effective criterion for bubble breakup.
- Existing models often neglect viscous shear, shearing-off, and surface instability effects in breakup.
- Two-group IATE performance is sensitive to channel geometry; models for various channel types are summarized.
Conclusions:
- Significant progress has been made in extending IATE beyond bubbly flow to churn-annual flow.
- Challenges remain in modeling highly distorted interfaces and experimental measurements.
- Further research is needed to address IATE's general applicability limitations and improve constitutive models.
More Related Videos
11:14A Microfluidic System with Surface Patterning for Investigating Cavitation Bubble(s)–Cell Interaction and the Resultant Bioeffects at the Single-cell Level
Published on: January 10, 2017
06:31Studying Surfactant Effects on Hydrate Crystallization at Oil-Water Interfaces Using a Low-Cost Integrated Modular Peltier Device
Published on: March 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble
Surface Tension of Fluid
Surface tension varies...
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Particle Size and Effective Surface Area
Capillarity in Fluid
Surface tension is crucial to capillarity. It results from cohesive forces between liquid molecules at the liquid-air boundary, forming a skin that resists external forces. When the capillary tube...
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...