Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimenter evidence unmasking as a confound in optional stopping.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

The therapeutic potential of pegylated arginase I treatment in glioblastoma.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Suggestion Effects in Psychedelics: Confounds and Opportunities.

The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis·2025
Same author

Introspective Access or Retrospective Inference? Mind-Wandering Reports Are Shaped by Performance Feedback.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Hypnosis at the Crossroads: A Primer of the Past and Visions for the Future.

The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis·2025
Same author

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1-mediated immune suppressive status is positively associated with brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Center·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.6K

Using adaptive psychophysics to identify the neural network reset time in subsecond interval timing.

Renata Sadibolova1, Stella Sun2, Devin B Terhune2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE146NW, UK. r.sadibolova@gold.ac.uk.

Experimental Brain Research
|September 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary

State-dependent network models require a reset period for accurate sub-second interval timing. This study precisely localizes this neural network reset time to approximately 250-333 milliseconds for optimal performance.

Keywords:
Adaptive psychophysicsBreakpointState-dependent networkTemporal discriminationTime perception

More Related Videos

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments
05:19

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments

Published on: November 12, 2019

7.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.6K
Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments
05:19

Using Neuron Spiking Activity to Trigger Closed-Loop Stimuli in Neurophysiological Experiments

Published on: November 12, 2019

7.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • State-dependent network models suggest neuronal populations need to reset for accurate interval timing.
  • Previous estimates for this neural reset interval are broad (250-500 ms), lacking specificity.
  • Understanding this reset boundary is crucial for characterizing state-dependent network dynamics in timing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To precisely determine the interval specificity of the neural reset boundary in sub-second timing.
  • To investigate how inter-stimulus interval affects duration discrimination performance.
  • To refine the estimated duration required for neural network reset in interval timing.

Main Methods:

  • Employed adaptive psychophysics in two sub-second auditory duration discrimination tasks (100 and 200 ms).
  • Manipulated the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between standard and comparison stimuli.
  • Included a control pitch discrimination task to isolate timing-specific effects.

Main Results:

  • Discrimination thresholds improved significantly with a 333 ms ISI compared to a 250 ms ISI in duration tasks.
  • This improvement was not observed in the control pitch discrimination task.
  • Results pinpoint a breakpoint in performance related to ISI, localizing the reset boundary more precisely.

Conclusions:

  • State-dependent networks involved in sub-second timing require approximately 250-333 ms to reset.
  • This finding refines our understanding of the temporal dynamics within neural networks for interval timing.
  • The precise reset window is critical for maintaining optimal timing accuracy.