Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

10:39
Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology
Published on: December 7, 2011
15.3K
Improved Assessment of Longitudinal Spinal Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Registration-Based Approach:
Paola Valsasina1, Mark A Horsfield2, Alessandro Meani1
1Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|September 28, 2021
Summary
A new registration-based method accurately measures cervical cord atrophy progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This method offers improved reliability for monitoring neurodegeneration in MS clinical studies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Medical Physics
- Neurology
Background:
- Cervical cord atrophy progression measurement is crucial for monitoring neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Existing methods for measuring cord atrophy may lack the necessary precision for clinical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a novel registration-based (Reg) method against two established techniques (active surface [AS] and propagation segmentation [PropSeg]) for quantifying cervical cord atrophy changes over time in MS.
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Reg method in measuring MS-related neurodegeneration.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study involving two cohorts of healthy controls (HC) and MS patients (totaling 91 HC and 191 MS patients) across different European sites.
- 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequences were acquired at 1.5T and 3.0T. Percentage cord area changes (PCACs) were calculated using Reg, AS, and PropSeg methods over follow-up periods of approximately 1-2 years.
- Linear regression and mixed-effect models were employed to assess annualized PCACs, effect sizes, and reproducibility, with intra- and inter-observer agreement evaluated.
Main Results:
- The registration-based (Reg) method demonstrated lower annualized percentage cord area changes (PCACs) with smaller standard errors compared to AS and PropSeg methods in MS patients at both 1.5T and 3.0T.
- Effect sizes were larger, and required sample sizes for clinical trials were smaller when using the Reg method.
- The Reg method achieved superior reproducibility, with intra- and inter-observer agreement exceeding 0.96, compared to 0.72-0.91 for the AS method.
Conclusions:
- The registration-based method provides a more reliable and sensitive approach for measuring cervical cord atrophy progression in multiple sclerosis.
- This advanced imaging analysis technique holds significant promise for enhancing the monitoring of neurodegeneration and the assessment of treatment efficacy in future MS clinical studies.

