Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Physiological Functions of Vitamin A Transporters Using HPLC-Based Vitamin A Profiling
Published on: December 27, 2024
Influence of Vitamin A Status on the Choice of Sampling Time for Application of the Retinol Isotope Dilution Method
Veronica Lopez-Teros1, Michael H Green2, Marjorie J Haskell3
1Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Background:
Vitamin A status may influence the choice of a blood sampling time for applying the retinol isotope dilution (RID) equation to predict vitamin A total body stores (TBS) in children.
Objectives:
We aimed to identify time(s) after administration of labeled vitamin A that provide accurate estimates of TBS in theoretical children with low or high TBS.
Methods:
We postulated 2- to 5-y-old children (12/group) with low (<200 μmol) or high TBS (≥700 μmol) and used compartmental analysis to simulate individual subject values for the RID equation TBS = FaS/SAp (Fa, fraction of dose in stores; S, retinol specific activity in plasma/in stores; SAp, retinol specific activity in plasma). Using individual SAp and group geometric mean FaS values from 1-28 d, we calculated individual and group mean TBS and compared them to assigned values.
Results:
Mean TBS was accurately predicted for both groups at all times. For individuals, predicted and assigned TBS were closest when the CV% for FaS was low [12-14%; 4-13 d (low), 12-28 d (high)]. The mean percentage error for TBS was <10% from 2-19 d (low) and 7-28 d (high). Predicted TBS was within 25% of assigned TBS for ≥80% of children from 3-23 d (low) and 9-28 d (high). Within groups, RID tended to overestimate lower TBS and underestimate higher TBS.
Conclusions:
Using a good estimate for FaS, accurate RID predictions of TBS for individuals will be obtained at many times. If vitamin A status is low, results indicate that early sampling (e.g., 4-13 d) is optimal; if vitamin A status is high, sampling at 12-28 d is indicated. When vitamin A status is unknown, sampling at 14 d is recommended, or a super-subject design can be used to obtain the group mean FaS at various times for RID prediction of TBS in individuals.
More Related Videos
08:18Author Spotlight: Unraveling Vitamin A Transport Mechanisms — Linking Liver Receptors to Vision Health Through RBPR2 and RBP4 Interactions
Published on: October 4, 2024
07:57Sampling and Pretreatment of Tooth Enamel Carbonate for Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Analysis
Published on: August 15, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods