Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
Published on: October 11, 2024
Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Benjamin Krüger1, Andreas Büchner, Waldo Nogueira
1Hannover Medical School, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Hannover, Germany.
Phantom stimulation in cochlear implants (CIs) can improve hearing for users with residual hearing. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and electric stimulation with phantom stimulation (EPS) showed similar benefits, but combining them with spectral overlap degraded speech perception.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve.
- Phantom stimulation is a technique to extend the pitch range of CIs towards the apical cochlea.
- Residual low-frequency hearing in CI users can be leveraged for improved speech perception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate phantom stimulation for conveying low-frequency information in CI users with residual hearing.
- To compare speech reception thresholds between electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and electric stimulation with phantom stimulation (EPS).
- To investigate the impact of spectrally overlapped speech information on speech reception when using simultaneous acoustic and phantom stimulation.
Main Methods:
- A repeated-measures design was used with 14 CI users having ipsilateral residual hearing.
- Phantom stimulation was implemented with varying compensation coefficients (σ) to shape electric fields.
- Speech reception thresholds were measured for electric stimulation alone, EAS, EPS, and simultaneous acoustic and phantom stimulation (EAS+PS).
Main Results:
- Both EAS and EPS significantly improved speech perception compared to electric stimulation alone.
- No significant difference in speech reception thresholds was found between EAS and EPS.
- Speech perception deteriorated when acoustic and phantom stimulation conveyed spectrally overlapped information, with deterioration increasing with greater overlap.
Conclusions:
- CI users with low-frequency residual hearing benefit from acoustic information via EAS.
- Phantom stimulation can improve speech reception thresholds in EAS users when acoustic stimulation is absent.
- Combining acoustic and phantom stimulation with spectral overlap negatively impacts speech perception compared to EAS.
More Related Videos
09:06Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: January 9, 2019
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024