Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Assessment of hybrid functionals for singlet and triplet excitations: Why do some local hybrid functionals perform so
Robin Grotjahn1, Martin Kaupp1
1Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Chemie, Theoretische Chemie/Quantenchemie, Sekr. C7, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract:
The performance of various hybrid density functionals is assessed for 105 singlet and 105 corresponding triplet vertical excitation energies from the QUEST database. The overall lowest mean absolute error is obtained with the local hybrid (LH) functional LH12ct-SsirPW92 with individual errors of 0.11 eV (0.11 eV) for singlet (triplet) n → π* excitations and 0.29 eV (0.17 eV) for π → π* excitations. This is slightly better than with the overall best performing global hybrid M06-2X [n → π*: 0.13 eV (0.17 eV), π → π*: 0.30 eV (0.20 eV)], while most other global and range-separated hybrids and some LHs suffer from the "triplet problem" of time-dependent density functional theory. This is exemplified by correlating the errors for singlet and triplet excitations on a state-by-state basis. The excellent performance of LHs based on a common local mixing function, i.e., an LMF constructed from the spin-summed rather than the spin-resolved semilocal quantities, is systematically investigated by the introduction of a spin-channel interpolation scheme that allows us to continuously modulate the fraction of opposite-spin terms used in the LMF. The correlation of triplet and singlet errors is systematically improved for the n → π* excitations when larger fractions of the opposite-spin-channel are used in the LMF, whereas this effect is limited for the π → π* excitations. This strongly supports a previously made hypothesis that attributes the excellent performance of LHs based on a common LMF to cross-spin-channel nondynamical correlation terms.
Related Concept Videos
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II
Resonance and Hybrid Structures
Resonance Structures and Resonance Hybrids
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N–O and N=O bonds.
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
The Energies of Atomic Orbitals

