Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

268
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
268
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

389
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
389
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

458
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
458
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

677
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
677
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

2.0K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.0K
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

203
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
203

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping the implementation of adult psychiatric home hospitalization services: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Development-centred neonatal care: validation study of the patient safety checklist.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026
Same author

What are the barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of information and communication technology-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health of healthcare workers: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Associated factors of caregiving burden among informal caregivers of patients with chronic illness: a cross-sectional study.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Prognostic value of combined tumor regression grade and TNM stage in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy.

Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica·2025
Same author

Deep learning-based frameworks for the detection and classification of soniferous fish.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.1K

Teaching Multiple Inverse Reinforcement Learners.

Francisco S Melo1, Manuel Lopes1

  • 1INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
|October 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed machine teaching algorithms for multiple inverse reinforcement learners facing heterogeneous tasks. Our findings show a single demonstration may not suffice for diverse agents, necessitating tailored teaching strategies like SplitTeach or JointTeach.

Keywords:
Markov decision processesclass teachingheterogeneous multi-agent teachinginverse reinforcement learningoptimal teaching

More Related Videos

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.1K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Machine teaching aims to efficiently impart knowledge to artificial agents.
  • Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) infers reward functions from expert demonstrations.
  • Teaching heterogeneous learners presents unique challenges due to differing capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formalize the problem of optimally teaching sequential tasks to a heterogeneous class of multiple inverse reinforcement learners.
  • To analyze the conditions under which a single demonstration can be used for teaching diverse agents.
  • To propose novel machine teaching algorithms addressing the challenges of heterogeneous IRL.

Main Methods:

  • Formalization of the optimal teaching problem for heterogeneous IRL.
  • Theoretical analysis to identify conditions for single-demonstration teaching.
  • Development of two algorithms: SplitTeach (individualized teaching after group learning) and JointTeach (single demonstration for the whole class).

Main Results:

  • Teaching heterogeneous learners with a single demonstration is often not possible due to agent differences.
  • SplitTeach ensures perfect task acquisition for all learners but requires more teaching effort.
  • JointTeach minimizes teaching effort but may not guarantee perfect task recovery.

Conclusions:

  • Heterogeneous student classes pose significant challenges for single-demonstration machine teaching.
  • SplitTeach offers optimal teaching performance, while JointTeach prioritizes minimal teaching effort.
  • The proposed algorithms and theoretical analysis provide valuable insights into multi-agent machine teaching.