A Comparative Study between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical FIGO Criteria in Different Stages of Carcinoma...

The objective of this study was to determine whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a sensitive and specific alternative method to clinical FIGO criteria in the staging of cervical carcinoma. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiology and Imaging, BSMMU, Dhaka during the period of September 2018 to August 2020. A total of 60 patients were selected purposively and all are staged clinically by EUA. Then all samples underwent MRI in Department of Radiology and Imaging, BSMMU. Images of uterine cervix, corpus, vagina and parametrium were taken with a prefixed standard protocol (TIWI axial, T2WI axial and sagittal, DWI axial & DCE) and reporting was done by Radiologist. Comparison was done between the MRI and clinical FIGO criteria of staging of cervical carcinoma. P value <0.05 was considered as significant. Sensitivity & specificity of the MRI was measured. Data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Out of 60 patients in this study the mean age was found 47.5±10.1 years with range from 22 to 60 years. Positive correlation (r=0.993; p=0.001) between histopathological size and MRI size of tumour. Positive correlation (r=0.950; p=0.001) between histopathological size and FIGO size of tumour. MRI findings more correlates with histopathology than clinically detected tumor size. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of MRI diagnosis evaluation for vaginal extension was 100.00%, 95.20%, 100.00%, 98.30% and 97.50% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of MRI diagnosis evaluation for parametrial invasion was 100.00%, all. In this study we observed that MRI staging was more likely to be concordant with pathological stage in comparison to the clinical stage. There was a concordance rate of 95.00% in MRI and 65.00% in clinical staging respectively. Out of 3 non-concordant cases in MRI, 2 were upstaged and 1 case was down staged in histopathology. FIGO staging concurred with histopathology in 39(65.00%) cases and differed in 21(35.00%) cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive and specific modality for accurate staging of cervical carcinoma in comparison with clinical FIGO criteria considering histopathology as gold standard.