Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
A Comfort Measures Only Checklist for Critical Care Providers: Impact on Satisfaction and Symptom Management
Emily Matone1, Denise Verosky, Matthew Siedsma
1Author Affiliations: University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing (Dr Matone); Clinical Director (Mrs Verosky), Supportive and Palliative Care, UPMC Mercy Hospital (retired), Pittsburgh; Clinical Assistant Professor (Dr Siedsma), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Intensivist (Dr Siedsma) and Critical Care Fellow (Dr O'Kane), Geisinger Medical Center, Pennsylvania; Associate Professor and Associate Director for Statistical Support (Dr Ren), University of Pittsburgh; Assistant Professor (Dr Harlan), Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing; and Associate Professor Acute and Tertiary Care, Director DNP Program, Coordinator (Dr Tuite), Adult-Geri CNS Area of Concentration, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pennsylvania.
Purpose:
This quality improvement project created a guide for critical care providers transitioning patients to comfort measures only encouraging communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; ensuring management of patients' end-of-life symptoms and needs; and enhancing provider satisfaction by improving structure and consistency when transitioning patients.
Description Of The Project:
Interviews conducted with staff in intensive care units revealed opportunities to improve structure and processes of transitioning patients at the end of life. A subcommittee of experts designed a checklist to facilitate interdisciplinary conversations. Impact on provider satisfaction and symptom management was assessed. Presurveys circulated used a Research Electronic Data Capture tool. A checklist was implemented for 3 months, and then postsurveys were sent. Charts were audited to identify improvement in symptom management and compared with retrospective samples.
Outcomes:
Clinical improvements were seen in communication (12%), collaboration (25%), shared decision making (22%), and order entry time (17%). In addition, 72% agreed the checklist improved structure and consistency; 69% reported improved communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; 61% felt it improved knowledge/understanding of patient needs; and 69% agreed it improved management of patient symptoms.
Conclusion:
After checklist implementation, staff felt more involved and more comfortable, and reported more clarity in transitioning patients; no improvement in patient outcomes was realized.
More Related Videos
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...