Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Patient Partners in Continuing Professional Development: Experience Developing an End-of-Life Care Program for Family
Sarah Tajani1, Angela Towle, Laura Beamish
1Ms. Tajani: Learning & Curriculum Manager, Division of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Dr. Towle: Co-Director Patient & Community Partnership for Education, Office of UBC Health & Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Ms. Beamish: Senior Manager, Rural CPD, Division of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Dr. Bluman: Executive Medical Director, Continuing Professional Development & Clinical Professor, Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada .
Abstract:
Involvement of patients in continuing professional development (CPD) is less developed than in health professional education at undergraduate or postgraduate levels. Although patients are sometimes involved in delivering CPD, they are less likely to be involved in education planning. At our institution, patients have sometimes acted as consultants in the design of CPD. The problem we address is how to engage patients as partners throughout the design process. We applied principles of authentic patient engagement and lessons learned from patient involvement in undergraduate health professional education to the design of CPD for family physicians. We created a partnership between the CPD Office and Patient and Community Partnership for Education, a unit with a history of patient involvement in the education of health professional students. Practices for meaningful involvement were identified through literature review, environmental scan, and interviewing key informants, including patients involved in health professional education at the university. These principles and practices were applied to the development of a CPD module on end-of-life care. Patient partners contributed new perspectives and some CPD providers reassessed components of their own practice as a result. Lessons learned include the need for stakeholder buy-in; mechanisms to identify those patients best able to contribute expertise; ways to facilitate involvement that work for both patients and CPD providers; the importance of feedback mechanisms to patient partners; and recognition for patient contributions. CPD offices should view integration of patient partners in program planning as an opportunity to engage in ongoing quality improvement.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Continuing Care
Patient-centered Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care