Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Detection and Disease Assessment in Real-Time Using M-ROSE
Published on: March 1, 2024
Improving Antibiotic Stewardship in Acute Appendicitis through Risk-Based Empiric Treatment Selection
Wayne Bauerle1, Michael O'Laughlin2, Heather Evans2
1Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract:
Empiric antimicrobial treatment selection for management of appendicitis is based on patient risk of infection with drug-resistant pathogens. Per Surgical Infection Society (SIS) guidelines, only high-risk patients should receive extended spectrum antibiotics. After observing substantial use of piperacillin-tazobactam at an academic medical center, a quality improvement initiative was developed targeting standardization of antibiotics for uncomplicated appendicitis. A project was performed to improve antibiotic stewardship in acute appendicitis treatment using plan-do-study-act methodology. We designed educational materials to guide risk-based empiric antimicrobial treatment selection for adult patients presenting with appendicitis. Implementation began January 1, 2020. High-risk criteria included presence of sepsis, presence of one or more comorbidities, and health-care-associated appendicitis. Retrospective chart review included adult patients admitted for appendectomy between January 1, 2019 and December 1, 2020. Pre-/post-implementation analysis and run chart analysis were performed. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving the correct antibiotic. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic cost. Patients treated pre-/post-implementation were compared using univariable analysis, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Of the 138 patients, 85 patients were in the pre-implementation group and 53 in the implementation group. The implementation group was 19.1% more likely to receive the correct antibiotic (pre = 31.8%; post = 50.9%; p = 0.03). Average cost per patient was reduced $13.25 (pre = $23.68 ± $18.76; post = $10.43 ± $8.45; p ≤ 0.0001). There were no differences in complications (pre = 2.4%; post = 0%; p = 0.26) or re-admissions (pre = 2.34%; post = 1.9%; p = 0.86). After an educational initiative to raise awareness about SIS guidelines for empiric antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis, we observed an increase in the number of patients receiving the appropriate antibiotic. Prescribing habits were altered with no adverse impact on clinical outcomes. The next phase will address sustainability by incorporating an electronic medical record order set to integrate just-in-time education within the provider workflow.
Insights
A quality improvement initiative improved appropriate antibiotic use for appendicitis by educating providers on Surgical Infection Society guidelines. This led to increased correct antibiotic administration and reduced costs without impacting patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Quality Improvement
- Surgical Management
Background:
- Empiric antimicrobial selection for appendicitis relies on patient risk for drug-resistant pathogens.
- Surgical Infection Society (SIS) guidelines recommend extended-spectrum antibiotics only for high-risk patients.
- Overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics like piperacillin-tazobactam was observed, prompting a quality improvement initiative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To standardize antibiotic selection for acute appendicitis based on patient risk.
- To improve antibiotic stewardship and align prescribing with SIS guidelines.
- To reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and associated costs.
Main Methods:
- A quality improvement project utilized plan-do-study-act methodology.
- Educational materials were developed to guide risk-based empiric antimicrobial treatment for adult appendicitis patients.
- Retrospective chart review compared antibiotic use, costs, and outcomes pre- and post-implementation.
Main Results:
- The implementation group showed a 19.1% increase in receiving the correct antibiotic (31.8% vs. 50.9%, p=0.03).
- Average antibiotic cost per patient decreased by $13.25 (p≤0.0001).
- No significant differences were observed in complications or re-admissions between groups.
Conclusions:
- An educational initiative effectively increased appropriate antibiotic use for appendicitis, aligning with SIS guidelines.
- Prescribing habits changed positively without adverse clinical outcomes.
- Future sustainability will involve integrating electronic medical record order sets for continuous provider support.
More Related Videos
11:17Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antibiotic Selection
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...