Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease
Luis G García-Chamorro1, Ezequiel J Zaidel1, Lara Gheco1
1Servicio de Cardiología, Servicio de Cardiología. Sanatorio Güemes, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Insights
Patients with Chagasic heart disease (CHD) experienced earlier effective implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks compared to those with ischemic heart disease (IHD). This highlights the need for ICDs in high-risk CHD populations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Chagasic heart disease (CHD) is a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death.
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death requiring defibrillator implantation.
- The effectiveness of automatic implantable defibrillators (AID) in CHD patients compared to IHD patients is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the timing of the first effective AID shock in patients with CHD versus IHD.
- To evaluate the efficacy of AID in managing arrhythmias in CHD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 64 patients (20 CHD, 44 IHD) who received an AID between 2009 and 2018.
- Analysis of time from AID implantation to the first effective shock.
- Comparison between CHD and IHD groups.
Main Results:
- CHD patients received effective AID shocks significantly earlier than IHD patients (HR: 8.4, p=0.0027 at 1 year; HR: 4.61, p=0.0072 at 3 years).
- 100% of CHD patients receiving AID for secondary prevention experienced a shock within 26 months.
- This indicates a high burden of life-threatening arrhythmias in this population.
Conclusions:
- Patients with CHD experience earlier effective AID shocks than those with IHD.
- AID is effective in the short term for CHD patients receiving it for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- These findings support AID use in high-risk CHD populations where clinical trial data are limited.
Objetives:
To assess if patients with Chagasic heart disease (CHD) received effective automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) shocks earlier than patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Methods:
Retrospective cohort of patients with CHD and IHD who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) between 2009 and 2018, in a tertiary hospital. We evaluated the time between the implant of ICD and the first effective shock in patients with CHD and compared it with the IHD control population.
Results:
We included a total of 64 patients, 20 with CHD and 44 with IHD. CHD patients presented earlier an effective shock than patients with IHD during the first year (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.4; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.09-34.02; p = 0.0027), and at three years (HR: 4.61; 95%CI: 1.51-14.07; p = 0.0072). 100% of CHD patients who received the ICD as secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death presented an effective shock during the first 26 months of follow-up.
Conclusions:
Patients with CHD received effective ICD shocks earlier than the IHD patients. All patients with CHD and ICD as secondary prevention had an appropriate ICD shock at short term, representing the highest risk population, and supporting the indication of the device in a setting where randomized clinical trials are lacking.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

