Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Identifying individual cost-balancing strategies when self-organizing task switching.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025

Same author

A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Sequential Effects on Reaction Time Distributions: Commonalities and Differences Across Paradigms.

Journal of cognition·2024

Same author

Estimating the proportions and latencies of reaction time outliers: A pooling method and case study of lexical decision tasks.

Behavior research methods·2024

Same author

Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.

Victor Mittelstädt¹, Ian Grant Mackenzie¹, Hartmut Leuthold¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Psychophysiology

|October 10, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Multitasking involves parallel processing during response selection but serial activation of motor responses. Cognitive resources are shared based on task relevance, preventing motor conflict.

Keywords:

EEG cognitive control dual task performance event-related potentials (ERPs)lateralized readiness potential multitasking

More Related Videos

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Human Psychology

Background:

Multitasking interference arises from limitations in cognitive processing.
The prioritized processing paradigm examines how task switching and probability influence performance.

Purpose of the Study:

To differentiate the roles of premotor and motor processes in multitasking interference.
To investigate the temporal dynamics of cognitive and motor activation during dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

Combined behavioral measures with electrophysiological measures (lateralized readiness potentials, LRPs).
Utilized a prioritized processing paradigm with manipulated background task probability.
Analyzed stimulus-locked and response-locked LRPs to assess motor activation timing.

Main Results:

Behavioral performance (response times, interference) was modulated by background task probability.
Electrophysiological data indicated that multitasking interference effects occurred during premotor stages (response selection), not motor execution.
Lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) suggest parallel processing in premotor areas and serial processing in motor areas.

Conclusions:

Multitasking allows parallel processing during response selection but serial activation of motor responses.
Limited cognitive resources are shared based on task relevance.
Task goals prevent motor activation for non-primary tasks to avoid conflict.