To draft or not to draft? A systematic review of North American sports' entry draft

In theory, professional sport "entry drafts" are designed to promote parity by granting poorly performing teams with early selections and winning teams with later selections. While this process has intentions to "level the playing field", mixed findings exist in the literature. The aim of this review is to identify and synthesize the literature examining the efficacy of the draft for professional, North American sport leagues. A systematic review of four databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Full-text articles containing relevant data on the draft system for the four major professional North American sports were identified. Further restrictions were made to include articles focusing on a specific outcome regarding future success (i.e., whether the draft related to a measure of future performance). The search returned 10 962 records and after screening, 18 articles were synthesized. Of the articles examined, the measures of future success with relation to draft order were (a) career length and/or number of games played at the majors (n = 8), (b) future performance statistics at the professional level (n = 5), (c) change in winning percentage and/or number of wins produced (n = 3), (d) financial compensation (n = 1), and (e) a combination of measures (a) to (d), (n = 1). Most commonly, the first/early rounds most accurately predicted future measures of success (ie, number of games played, signing bonuses, and playing statistics) across sports. The middle and late rounds were less accurate, with the degree of accuracy increasing slightly in the last rounds. This review highlights several opportunities to better understand the draft process (e.g., potential improvements in middle round picks) and emphasizes the need for more research on analyzing and scrutinizing the draft.