Influence of Pre-operative HbA1c on Bariatric Surgery Outcomes-the Sunderland (UK) Experience

Nehemiah Samuel1, Abdalla Mustafa2, Helen Hawkins1

  • 1Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, Sunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.

Obesity Surgery
|October 11, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Delaying bariatric surgery for poorly controlled diabetes is not justifiable. Patients with high HbA1c (≥8.5%) experience similar peri-operative complication rates and outcomes to those with well-controlled diabetes, indicating surgery can proceed without pre-operative optimization.

Area of Science:

  • Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
  • Diabetology
  • Surgical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • UK guidelines suggest HbA1c < 8.5% before elective surgery.
  • Optimizing pre-operative glycemic control in diabetics can be challenging.
  • The study investigates the impact of pre-operative HbA1c on surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correlate pre-operative HbA1c levels with peri-operative complication rates in bariatric surgery.
  • To determine if elective bariatric surgery should be delayed in patients with poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 8.5%).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (2014-2018).
  • Patients categorized into three groups: non-diabetics (HbA1c < 6.5%), well-controlled diabetics (6.5-8.4%), and poorly controlled diabetics (≥ 8.5%).
  • Primary outcome assessed was peri-operative complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Early complication rates were low and similar across all groups (1.0% vs 1.7% vs 1.1%, p=0.592).
  • No significant differences in mean length of stay or 30-day re-admission rates were observed between groups.
  • Sustained and equal reduction in HbA1c was noted at 6 months and 1 year post-surgery in all groups.

Conclusions:

  • Metabolic surgery for poorly controlled diabetes yields non-inferior peri-operative outcomes.
  • Delaying metabolic surgery to optimize glycemic control is not clinically justifiable based on these findings.
Abstract