Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
Published on: May 13, 2019
Advice on comparing two independent samples of circular data in biology
Lukas Landler1, Graeme D Ruxton2, E Pascal Malkemper3
1Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33/I, 1180, Vienna, Austria. lukas.landler@boku.ac.at.
Abstract:
Many biological variables are recorded on a circular scale and therefore need different statistical treatment. A common question that is asked of such circular data involves comparison between two groups: Are the populations from which the two samples are drawn differently distributed around the circle? We compared 18 tests for such situations (by simulation) in terms of both abilities to control Type-I error rate near the nominal value, and statistical power. We found that only eight tests offered good control of Type-I error in all our simulated situations. Of these eight, we were able to identify the Watson's U2 test and a MANOVA approach, based on trigonometric functions of the data, as offering the best power in the overwhelming majority of our test circumstances. There was often little to choose between these tests in terms of power, and no situation where either of the remaining six tests offered substantially better power than either of these. Hence, we recommend the routine use of either Watson's U2 test or MANOVA approach when comparing two samples of circular data.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Test for Homogeneity
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

