Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

10:34
Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Published on: August 30, 2020
10.8K
Influence of Insurance Status on Subdural Hematoma Management: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis
Jennifer E Sullivan1, Suraj Panjwani2, Mitchell A Cahan3
1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
The Journal of Surgical Research
|October 17, 2021
Summary
Publicly insured patients with traumatic subdural hematomas (SDH) are more likely to receive surgery than self-pay patients. Insurance status did not affect monitoring or length of stay outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Trauma surgery
- Public health
- Health services research
Background:
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subdural hematomas (SDH) are significant public health issues.
- Previous research has not specifically examined insurance status's role in SDH treatment and outcomes.
- Social determinants of health, including insurance, may influence patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between insurance status and the management of traumatic subdural hematomas (SDH).
- To determine if insurance status impacts surgical intervention versus intracranial pressure (ICP)/external ventricular drain (EVD) monitoring for SDH.
- To analyze the effect of insurance on patient outcomes, including length of stay and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (2012-2016).
- Inclusion of 68,687 adult patients with a single diagnosis of subdural hematoma.
- Statistical adjustment for demographic factors, injury severity, and other clinical variables.
Main Results:
- Publicly insured patients were 1.86 times more likely to undergo craniotomy/craniectomy than self-pay patients.
- Insurance status did not significantly influence the likelihood of receiving ICP/EVD monitoring.
- No significant differences were observed in emergency department, hospital, or ICU length of stay between insurance groups.
Conclusions:
- Public insurance is associated with higher odds of surgical management for traumatic SDH.
- Further research is needed to understand the implications of insurance status on SDH treatment and outcomes.
- Findings highlight potential disparities in care influenced by socioeconomic factors.

