Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alarmingly High Rates of Complications and Refracture Among Patients with Early Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Within 30 Days After THA.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

The John Charnley Award: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Dual Mobility and Single Bearings for Patients at High Risk of Dislocation Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Certificate-of-Need Legislation That Targets Construction of Ambulatory Surgery Centers Is Associated With Increased Patient Migration Out-of-State for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Do Hip Precautions Matter After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Capsular Repair? A Randomized Control Trial.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

The Clinical Significance of Hyponatremia Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

JB & JS open access·2026
Same author

Do Outcomes Differ After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Based on Indications? A Prospective Cohort Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same journal

The Reconstructive Pelvic Anatomy classification system : a valid and reliable classification system for pelvic reconstruction.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same journal

Protocol for Novel Perioperative Optimization of Obese Osteoarthritic Patients pending Total Knee Replacement with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (NPO-OOPS-TKR) : a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same journal

Fast fix or false hope? Polyethylene exchange in unstable primary unconstrained total knee arthroplasty.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same journal

Establishing the UK clubfoot research priorities : a multiple-stakeholder consensus study.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same journal

Automated impaction in uncemented total hip arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same journal

Postoperative best practice for thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement : a Delphi consensus study.

Bone & joint open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Design and Fabrication of an Elastomeric Unit for Soft Modular Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery
11:06

Design and Fabrication of an Elastomeric Unit for Soft Modular Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Published on: November 14, 2015

9.1K

Malseating of modular dual mobility liners.

Jonathan Guntin1, Darren Plummer1, Craig Della Valle1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Bone & Joint Open
|October 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dual mobility hip implant liners can become dislodged, with smaller component sizes increasing the risk. This study found a 5.0% incidence of malseating without immediate clinical consequences.

Keywords:
MDMMetal ionUnivariate analysisacetabular componentsacetabular shellclinical outcomesdual mobilitydual mobility implantsmalseatingpatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)radiographsrevision surgeryrevision total hip arthroplasties

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

21.3K
Construction of Modular Hydrogel Sheets for Micropatterned Macro-scaled 3D Cellular Architecture
10:55

Construction of Modular Hydrogel Sheets for Micropatterned Macro-scaled 3D Cellular Architecture

Published on: January 11, 2016

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Design and Fabrication of an Elastomeric Unit for Soft Modular Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery
11:06

Design and Fabrication of an Elastomeric Unit for Soft Modular Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Published on: November 14, 2015

9.1K
Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

21.3K
Construction of Modular Hydrogel Sheets for Micropatterned Macro-scaled 3D Cellular Architecture
10:55

Construction of Modular Hydrogel Sheets for Micropatterned Macro-scaled 3D Cellular Architecture

Published on: January 11, 2016

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Modular dual mobility liners are used in total hip arthroplasty.
  • Previous studies report a malseating incidence ranging from 5.8% to 16.4%.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Determine the incidence of dual mobility liner malseating at our institution.
  • Identify risk factors associated with liner malseating.
  • Evaluate the clinical impact of liner malseating on patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 239 total hip arthroplasties with modular dual mobility liners.
  • Radiographic assessment for malseating by two independent reviewers, with a third as tiebreaker.
  • Univariate analysis to identify risk factors and Youden's index for cut-off points.

Main Results:

  • A 5.0% incidence of radiological malseating was observed (12/239 liners).
  • Component size of 50 mm or less was significantly associated with malseating (p=0.031).
  • No associated clinical consequences or revision surgeries were noted at a mean follow-up of 14 months.

Conclusions:

  • The incidence of liner malseating is 5.0%, consistent with prior literature.
  • Smaller component size (<50 mm) is a risk factor for malseating.
  • Further investigation into implant design and instrumentation is recommended to mitigate malseating risk.