Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Development of a prehospital prediction model for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
Kristoffer Wibring1, Markus Lingman2, Johan Herlitz3
1Department of Ambulance and Prehospital Care, Region Halland, Sweden; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Introduction:
Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for contacting the emergency medical services (EMS). About 15% of these chest pain patients have a high-risk condition, while many of them have a low-risk condition with no need for acute hospital care. It is challenging to at an early stage distinguish whether patients have a low- or high-risk condition. The objective of this study has been to develop prediction models for optimising the identification of patients with low- respectively high-risk conditions in acute chest pain early in the EMS work flow.
Methods:
This prospective observational cohort study included 2578 EMS missions concerning patients who contacted the EMS in a Swedish region due to chest pain in 2018. All the patients were assessed as having a low-, intermediate- or high-risk condition, i.e. occurrence of a time-sensitive diagnosis at discharge from hospital. Multivariate regression analyses using data on symptoms and symptom onset, clinical findings including ECG, previous medical history and Troponin T were carried out to develop models for identification of patients with low- respectively high-risk conditions. Developed models where then tested hold-out data set for internal validation and assessing their accuracy.
Results:
Prediction models for risk-stratification based on variables mutual for both low- and high-risk prediction were developed. The variables included were: age, sex, previous medical history of kidney disease, atrial fibrillation or heart failure, Troponin T, ST-depression on ECG, paleness, pain debut during activity, constant pain, pain in right arm and pressuring pain quality. The high-risk model had an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.85 and the corresponding figure for the low-risk model was 0.78.
Conclusions:
Models based on readily available information in the EMS setting can identify high- and low-risk conditions with acceptable accuracy. A clinical decision support tool based on developed models may provide valuable clinical guidance and facilitate referral to less resource-intensive venues.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation