Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
Published on: April 21, 2023
The accuracy of several pose estimation methods for 3D joint centre localisation.
Laurie Needham1, Murray Evans2, Darren P Cosker2
1Centre for the Analysis of Motion, Entertainment Research and Applications, University of Bath, Bath, UK. ln424@bath.ac.uk.
Markerless pose estimation shows promise for movement studies outside the lab. However, current 3D joint accuracy, especially at the hip and knee, still lags behind marker-based motion capture.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Analysis
- Computer Vision
Background:
- Traditional motion capture is lab-bound and resource-intensive.
- Markerless pose estimation offers potential for 'in-the-wild' human movement studies.
- The accuracy of markerless systems requires thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of markerless deep-learning pose estimation algorithms.
- To compare 3D joint center locations derived from markerless methods against marker-based motion capture.
- To identify discrepancies in joint center accuracy across different activities.
Main Methods:
- Utilized OpenPose, AlphaPose, and DeepLabCut for 3D joint center estimation.
- Collected synchronized marker-based motion capture and multi-camera high-speed (200 Hz) imaging data.
- Applied algorithms to 2D image data and reconstructed 3D joint locations for walking, running, and jumping.
Main Results:
- Systematic differences of 30-50 mm observed at the hip and knee, likely due to training data mislabeling.
- Smaller differences (1-15 mm) noted at the ankle, varying by activity.
- Markerless systems showed activity-dependent accuracy compared to marker-based systems.
Conclusions:
- Markerless motion capture is a promising technology for liberating movement research from laboratory settings.
- Current 3D joint center accuracy from markerless systems is not consistently comparable to marker-based methods.
- Further refinement of algorithms and training data is needed for widespread adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Centroid of a Body: Problem Solving
The x-coordinates and y-coordinates of each element's...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
Errors in Global Positioning System

