Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
Published on: May 19, 2023
Evaluation of Hepatic Iron Overload Using a Contemporary 0.55 T MRI System
Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn1, Christine Mancini1, Anna Conrey2
1Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Background:
MRI T2* and R2* mapping have gained clinical acceptance for noninvasive assessment of iron overload. Lower field MRI may offer increased measurement dynamic range in patients with high iron concentration and may potentially increase MRI accessibility, but it is compromised by lower signal-to-noise ratio that reduces measurement precision.
Purpose:
To characterize a high-performance 0.55 T MRI system for evaluating patients with liver iron overload.
Study Type:
Prospective.
Population:
Forty patients with known or suspected iron overload (sickle cell anemia [n = 5], ß-thalassemia [n = 3], and hereditary spherocytosis [n = 2]) and a liver iron phantom.
Field Strength/Sequence:
A breath-held multiecho gradient echo sequence at 0.55 T and 1.5 T.
Assessment:
Patients were imaged with T2*/R2* mapping 0.55 T and 1.5 T within 24 hours, and 16 patients returned for follow-up exams within 6-16 months, resulting in 56 paired studies. Liver T2* and R2* measurements and standard deviations were compared between 0.55 T and 1.5 T and used to validate a predictive model between field strengths. The model was then used to classify iron overload at 0.55 T.
Statistical Tests:
Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used for comparisons, and measurement precision was assessed using the coefficient of variation. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
R2* was significantly lower at 0.55 T in our cohort (488 ± 449 s-1 at 1.5 T vs. 178 ± 155 s-1 at 0.55 T, n = 56 studies) and in the patients with severe iron overload (937 ± 369 s-1 at 1.5 T vs. 339 ± 127 s-1 at 0.55 T, n = 23 studies). The coefficient of variation indicated reduced precision at 0.55 T (3.5 ± 2.2% at 1.5 T vs 6.9 ± 3.9% at 0.55 T). The predictive model accurately predicted 1.5 T R2* from 0.55 T R2* (Bland Altman bias = -6.6 ± 20.5%). Using this model, iron overload at 0.55 T was classified as: severe R2* > 185 s-1 , moderate 81 s-1 < R2* < 185 s-1 , and mild 45 s-1 < R2* < 91 s-1 .
Data Conclusion:
We demonstrated that 0.55 T provides T2* and R2* maps that can be used for the assessment of liver iron overload in patients.
Evidence Level:
2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

