Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
Early versus delayed introduction of human milk fortification in enterally fed preterm infants: A systematic review
Cathie Hilditch1,2,3,4, Amy Keir1,2,3,4, Carmel T Collins1,2
1SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Insights
Introducing human milk fortification early or delayed in preterm infants showed no significant differences in necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or feeding intolerance. The impact on infant growth remains uncertain due to very low-quality evidence.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Preterm infants require specialized nutritional support.
- Human milk fortification is crucial for growth and development.
- Optimal timing for initiating fortification is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effects of early versus delayed human milk fortification in preterm infants.
- To compare adverse feeding outcomes and infant growth based on fortification timing.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Searched major databases including Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL.
- Included three trials involving 378 preterm infants.
Main Results:
- Compared fortification at ≤40 mL/kg/day versus ≥75 mL/kg/day.
- Found little to no difference in necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or feeding intolerance (low-quality evidence).
- Infant growth showed no significant difference (very low-quality evidence).
Conclusions:
- The optimal timing for human milk fortification in preterm infants is uncertain.
- Early fortification (≤40 mL/kg/day) versus delayed (≥75 mL/kg/day) does not clearly improve growth or reduce adverse feeding outcomes.
- Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the benefits of early fortification.
Aim:
To assess effects of early versus delayed introduction of human milk fortification in preterm infants.
Methods:
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and CINAHL for randomised controlled trials evaluating start time for human milk fortification in preterm infants (March 2020). Two authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, extracted data and assessed evidence certainty.
Results:
We identified 1307 publications and included three trials (378 infants). Meta-analysis comparing fortification commencing at an enteral feed volume of ≤40 mL/kg/day versus ≥75 mL/kg/day, showed little to no difference in rates of necrotising enterocolitis (3 trials), sepsis (3 trials), feeding intolerance (2 trials) (low-quality evidence) and infant growth (1 trial, very low-quality evidence).
Conclusions:
Whether early introduction of fortification, at an enteral feed volume of ≤40 mL versus delayed at ≥75 mL/kg/day improves growth or influences adverse feeding outcomes is very uncertain.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

