Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Dorsal Skin of Hamsters: a Useful Model for the Screening of Antileishmanial Drugs
Published on: April 21, 2012
Treatment of Complex Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Liposomal Amphotericin B
Maria Ubals1,2, Pau Bosch-Nicolau3, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá3
1Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is a promising treatment for complex cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), showing no failures in a Spanish cohort. Close monitoring for reversible adverse events is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Complex cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) lacks a definitive treatment consensus.
- This study focuses on evaluating liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) outcomes in CL patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe a cohort of CL patients.
- To evaluate the treatment outcome of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in complex CL cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study conducted at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
- Inclusion of patients with parasitologically confirmed CL from 2012 to 2018.
Main Results:
- 41 CL patients analyzed; 17 had complex CL requiring systemic treatment.
- 16 patients received L-AmB; 50% experienced adverse events, 19% discontinued treatment due to safety.
- All L-AmB treated cases achieved cure within one year post-treatment.
Conclusions:
- L-AmB demonstrated no treatment failures in complex CL, presenting a viable alternative.
- Vigilant monitoring for L-AmB's potential adverse events is crucial for managing reversible side effects.
Background:
There is no consensus for the best treatment of complex cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). We aimed to describe a cohort of CL, focusing on liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) treatment outcome.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective study in Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (Barcelona, Spain). All patients with parasitologically proven CL diagnosed from 2012 to 2018 were included.
Results:
The analysis included 41 patients with CL. The median age was 39 years (IQR 12- 66); 12 (29%) were children, and 29 (71%) were men. Regarding treatment, 24 (59%) received local treatment, whereas 17 (41%) had complex CL and were offered intravenous systemic treatment. Sixteen patients received L-AmB; eight (50%) had adverse events, and three (19%) discontinued treatment for safety reasons. All cases were considered cured within the first year post-treatment.
Conclusions:
L-AmB for complex CL showed no treatment failures, offering an alternative treatment option for patients with complex CL. Clinicians should pay close attention to the potential adverse events of L-AmB and adopt an active drug safety surveillance scheme to rapidly detect reversible side effects.
More Related Videos
12:22A Parasite Rescue and Transformation Assay for Antileishmanial Screening Against Intracellular Leishmania donovani Amastigotes in THP1 Human Acute Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line
Published on: December 30, 2012
06:57In Vivo Infection with Leishmania amazonensis to Evaluate Parasite Virulence in Mice
Published on: February 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Leishmaniasis
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Antifungal Agents
Antiprotozoal Agents