Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
3D Harmonic and Subharmonic Imaging for Characterizing Breast Lesions: A Multi-Center Clinical Trial
Flemming Forsberg1, Catherine W Piccoli2, Anush Sridharan1,3
1Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Objective:
Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer among women. This multi-center study assessed the ability of 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound to characterize suspicious breast lesions using clinical assessments and quantitative parameters.
Methods:
Women with suspicious breast lesions scheduled for biopsy were enrolled in this prospective, study. Following 2D grayscale ultrasound and power Doppler imaging (PDI), a contrast agent (Definity; Lantheus) was administrated. Contrast-enhanced 3D harmonic imaging (HI; transmitting/receiving at 5.0/10.0 MHz), as well as 3D subharmonic imaging (SHI; transmitting/receiving at 5.8/2.9 MHz), were performed using a modified Logiq 9 scanner (GE Healthcare). Five radiologists independently scored the imaging modes (including standard-of-care imaging) using a 7-point BIRADS scale as well as lesion vascularity and diagnostic confidence. Parametric volumes were constructed from time-intensity curves for vascular heterogeneity, perfusion, and area under the curve. Diagnostic accuracy was determined relative to pathology using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and reverse, step-wise logistical regression analyses. The κ-statistic was calculated for inter-reader agreement.
Results:
Data were successfully acquired in 219 cases and biopsies indicated 164 (75%) benign and 55 (25%) malignant lesions. SHI depicted more anastomoses and vascularity than HI (P < .021), but there were no differences by pathology (P > .27). Ultrasound achieved accuracies of 82 to 85%, which was significantly better than standard-of-care imaging (72%; P < .03). SHI increased diagnostic confidence by 3 to 6% (P < .05), but inter-reader agreements were medium to low (κ < 0.52). The best regression model achieved 97% accuracy by combining clinical reads and parametric SHI.
Conclusions:
Combining quantitative 3D SHI parameters and clinical assessments improves the characterization of suspicious breast lesions.
More Related Videos
12:23Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
Published on: August 14, 2012
05:41Author Spotlight: Integrating Ultrasound Imaging with Biochemical Markers for Thyroid Disease Diagnosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography