Validity of inertial measurement units for tracking human motion: a systematic review

Human motion is often tracked using three-dimensional video motion tracking systems, which have demonstrated high levels of validity. More recently, inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been used to measure human movement due to their ease of access and application. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the validity of inertial sensor systems when being used to track human motion. Four electronic databases were used for the search, and eleven studies were included in the final review. IMUs have a high level of agreement with motion capture systems in the frontal and sagittal planes, measured with root mean square error (RMSE), intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson's correlation. However, the transverse or rotational planes began to show large discrepancies in joint angles between systems. Furthermore, as the intensity of the task being measured increased, the RMSE values began to get much larger. Currently, the use of accelerometers and inertial sensor systems has limited application in the assessment of human motion, but if the precision and processing of IMU devices improves further, it could provide researchers an opportunity to collect data in less synthetic environments, as well as improve ease of access to biomechanically analyse human movement.