Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Comparative analysis of major incident triage tools in children: a UK population-based analysis
James Vassallo1,2, Saisakul Chernbumroong3,4, Nabeela Malik3,4
1Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport, UK jamie.vassallo@nhs.net.
Insights
The Sheffield Paediatric Triage Tool (SPTT) and Modified Physiological Triage Tool-24 (MPTT-24) show promise in identifying children needing life-saving interventions during major incidents, outperforming current pediatric tools.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Care
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- Effective major incident management relies on robust triage systems.
- Existing pediatric triage tools lack sufficient evidence for guiding interventions.
- There is a critical need for validated triage methods in pediatric mass casualty events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of nine adult and pediatric triage tools.
- To evaluate the Sheffield Paediatric Triage Tool (SPTT) against established methods.
- To identify tools that accurately detect pediatric patients requiring life-saving interventions (LSIs).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 15,133 pediatric patients (<16 years) from the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database (2008-2017).
- Primary outcome: identification of patients receiving at least one LSI.
- Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, undertriage, and overtriage rates.
Main Results:
- The SPTT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (92.2%) for identifying LSIs but had the highest overtriage rate (75.0%).
- The Modified Physiological Triage Tool-24 (MPTT-24) showed high sensitivity (80.8%) with acceptable overtriage (70.2%).
- Existing pediatric tools like Paediatric Triage Tape and JumpSTART had lower sensitivity for LSI detection.
Conclusions:
- The SPTT and MPTT-24 are superior to current pediatric triage tools in identifying patients needing LSIs.
- These findings suggest a potential shift in recommended major incident triage practices.
- Consideration should be given to a single, generic triage tool like the MPTT-24 for both adults and children.
Introduction:
Triage is a key principle in the effective management of major incidents. There is currently a paucity of evidence to guide the triage of children. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of nine adult and paediatric triage tools, including the novel 'Sheffield Paediatric Triage Tool' (SPTT), assessing their ability in identifying patients needing life-saving interventions (LSIs).
Methods:
A 10-year (2008-2017) retrospective database review of the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) Database for paediatric patients (<16 years) was performed. Primary outcome was identification of patients receiving one or more LSIs from a previously defined list. Secondary outcomes included mortality and prediction of Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15. Primary analysis was conducted on patients with complete prehospital physiological data with planned secondary analyses using first recorded data. Performance characteristics were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, undertriage and overtriage.
Results:
15 133 patients met TARN inclusion criteria. 4962 (32.8%) had complete prehospital physiological data and 8255 (54.5%) had complete first recorded physiological data. The majority of patients were male (69.5%), with a median age of 11.9 years. The overwhelming majority of patients (95.4%) sustained blunt trauma, yielding a median ISS of 9 and overall, 875 patients (17.6%) received at least one LSI. The SPTT demonstrated the greatest sensitivity of all triage tools at identifying need for LSI (92.2%) but was associated with the highest rate of overtriage (75.0%). Both the Paediatric Triage Tape (sensitivity 34.1%) and JumpSTART (sensitivity 45.0%) performed less well at identifying LSI. By contrast, the adult Modified Physiological Triage Tool-24 (MPTT-24) triage tool had the second highest sensitivity (80.8%) with tolerable rates of overtriage (70.2%).
Conclusion:
The SPTT and MPTT-24 outperform existing paediatric triage tools at identifying those patients requiring LSIs. This may necessitate a change in recommended practice. Further work is needed to determine the optimum method of paediatric major incident triage, but consideration should be given to simplifying major incident triage by the use of one generic tool (the MPTT-24) for adults and children.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

