Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

07:34
Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
Published on: March 14, 2013
12.9K
Multilaboratory Collaborative Study of a Nontarget Data Acquisition for Target Analysis (nDATA) Workflow Using Liquid
Jon W Wong1, Jian Wang2, James S Chang3,4
1Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
|October 28, 2021
Summary
Nontarget data acquisition (nDATA) workflows show promise for pesticide screening in food. A collaborative study validated this approach, demonstrating high detection rates and low error rates for pesticide identification in produce.
Area of Science:
- Food safety analysis
- Analytical chemistry
- Mass spectrometry
Background:
- Nontarget data acquisition (nDATA) workflows using liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass (LC-HRAM) spectrometry offer potential for broad screening of pesticides in food.
- However, rigorous evaluation of these workflows, including instrument processing software, is crucial before routine implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To collaboratively evaluate an nDATA workflow for pesticide screening in high-moisture produce across multiple laboratories.
- To assess the performance of LC-HRAM platforms (QOrbitrap and QTOF) using full-scan/data-independent acquisition (FS MS/DIA MS/MS) and a restricted pesticide database.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five laboratories participated, extracting pesticides from produce using the QuEChERS method.
- Data were acquired via UHPLC-MS/MS, and pesticide identification relied on retention time and mass accuracy criteria for precursor and product ions.
- The workflow was tested with a 51-pesticide database and vendor software, analyzing unfortified and fortified samples (10 and 100 μg/kg).
Main Results:
- Elution profiles of 51 pesticides were consistent across 24 laboratories (±0.5 min).
- Low false negative rates (0.7% at 10 μg/kg, 0.1% at 100 μg/kg) and a false positive rate of 1.1% were achieved.
- Twenty-two laboratories successfully identified all blinded fortified pesticides (5-50 μg/kg) in produce samples, yielding a 99.7% detection rate.
Conclusions:
- The nDATA workflow demonstrates broad screening capabilities for pesticide analysis in food matrices.
- This validated approach provides a robust platform for identifying chemical residues and contaminants, with potential for expansion to other analytes.
Keywords:
data-independent acquisition (DIA)liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass (LC-HRAM) spectrometrynontarget data acquisition for target analysis (nDATA)pesticidesquadrupole Orbitrap (QOrbitrap)quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF)quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS)
