Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.5K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.5K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle03:06

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

55.2K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
55.2K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.5K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.5K
The Principle of Superposition and the Gravitational Field01:17

The Principle of Superposition and the Gravitational Field

1.7K
The principle of superposition applies to gravitational forces of objects that are sufficiently far apart. It states that the net gravitational force on a point object is the vector sum of the gravitational forces on it due to various objects. The principle helps calculate the force by listing the individual forces and then vectorially summing them up. However, it should be noted that the principle of superposition is not always apparent. In the presence of a second force, the first force could...
1.7K
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus01:10

Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus

2.1K
The two theorems developed by Pappus and Guldinus are widely used in mathematics, engineering, and physics to find the surface area and volume of any body of revolution. This is done by revolving a plane curve around an axis that does not intersect the curve to find its surface area or revolving a plane area around a non-intersecting axis to calculate its volume.
For finding the surface area, consider a differential line element that generates a ring with surface area dA when revolved.
2.1K
Reynolds Transport Theorem01:24

Reynolds Transport Theorem

1.4K
The Reynolds transport theorem provides a framework to relate the time rate of change of an extensive property within a system to that in a control volume, which is crucial for analyzing fluid dynamics. Extensive properties, such as mass, velocity, acceleration, temperature, and momentum, can be expressed in terms of the mass of a fluid portion. These properties are called extensive because they depend on the system's size, while intensive properties are their corresponding values per unit...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Effects of Common Antihypertensive Class Medications on BMI z-Score in Adolescents.

Pediatric obesity·2026
Same author

Long-acting injectable cabotegravir HIV PrEP uptake, adherence, and persistence in two large US integrated healthcare systems.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

Long-term effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a multicountry, population-based randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.7K

Revisiting the g-null Paradox.

Sean McGrath1, Jessica G Young2,3, Miguel A Hernán1,3,4

  • 1From the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|October 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The parametric g-formula can produce biased causal effect estimates due to the g-null paradox when models are too simple. Researchers should use more complex models to avoid this bias in observational studies.

More Related Videos

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
06:59

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis

Published on: August 11, 2010

12.1K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.7K
A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
06:59

A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis

Published on: August 11, 2010

12.1K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Causal Inference
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The parametric g-formula estimates causal effects from observational data.
  • The g-null paradox arises from model misspecification, particularly with time-varying confounders.
  • This paradox is a known limitation but requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the meaning and implications of the g-null paradox.
  • To illustrate the bias introduced by the g-null paradox in parametric g-formula estimates.
  • To provide guidance on avoiding model misspecification.

Main Methods:

  • Revisiting the theoretical underpinnings of the g-null paradox.
  • Presenting analytic examples demonstrating the paradox.
  • Conducting simulation-based illustrations of estimation bias.

Main Results:

  • Parametric g-formula estimates are biased under conditions associated with the g-null paradox.
  • Overly parsimonious models exacerbate the bias.
  • Identifiability conditions do not prevent bias when time-varying confounders are treatment-affected.

Conclusions:

  • The g-null paradox is a critical consideration in causal inference using the parametric g-formula.
  • Avoiding overly simplistic models is crucial for accurate causal effect estimation.
  • Researchers must be aware of and address potential model misspecification.