Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Implications of Myocardial Infarction on Management and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock
Richard G Jung1,2,3, Pietro Di Santo1,4,5, Rebecca Mathew1,5,6
1CAPITAL Research Group Division of Cardiology University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Insights
Patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock face higher mortality and need for interventions like mechanical circulatory support and renal replacement therapy compared to other cardiogenic shock patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The DOREMI trial compared milrinone and dobutamine for cardiogenic shock.
- Subgroup analysis is needed to understand outcomes in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMICS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical management and outcomes in AMICS versus non-AMICS patients.
Main Methods:
- Subgroup analysis of 192 cardiogenic shock patients from the DOREMI trial.
- Patients randomized to dobutamine or milrinone.
- Primary endpoint: 30-day composite of mortality, cardiac arrest, MI, stroke, mechanical support, or renal replacement therapy.
Main Results:
- AMICS patients (n=65) had a significantly higher primary composite endpoint than non-AMICS (n=127) (HR 2.21, P=0.0001).
- Increased mortality, mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy drove the difference.
- AMICS remained associated with adverse outcomes after adjustment for confounders.
Conclusions:
- Acute myocardial infarction complicates cardiogenic shock, leading to worse outcomes.
- Contrast administration during revascularization may increase renal replacement therapy rates.
- Tailored interventions are needed for specific cardiogenic shock subgroups like AMICS.
Abstract:
Background The randomized DOREMI (Dobutamine Compared to Milrinone) clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of milrinone and dobutamine in patients with cardiogenic shock. Whether the results remain consistent when stratified by acute myocardial infarction remains unknown. In this substudy, we sought to evaluate differences in clinical management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) versus non-AMICS. Methods and Results Patients in cardiogenic shock (n=192) were randomized 1:1 to dobutamine or milrinone. The primary composite end point in this subgroup analysis was all-cause in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, the need for mechanical circulatory support, or initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30-days. Outcomes were evaluated in patients with (n=65) and without (n=127) AMICS. The primary composite end point was significantly higher in AMICS versus non-AMICS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; 95% CI, 1.47-3.30; P=0.0001). The primary end point was driven by increased rates of all-cause mortality, mechanical circulatory support, and RRT. No differences in other secondary outcomes including cardiac arrest or cerebrovascular accident were observed. AMICS remained associated with the primary composite outcome, 30-day mortality, and RRT after adjustment for age, sex, procedural contrast use, multivessel disease, and inotrope type. Conclusions AMI was associated with increased rates of adverse clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock along with increased rates of mortality and initiation of mechanical circulatory support and RRT. Contrast administration during revascularization likely contributes to increased rates of RRT. Heterogeneity of outcomes in AMICS versus non-AMICS highlights the need to study interventions in specific subgroups of cardiogenic shock. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03207165.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

