Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

2.5K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
2.5K
Regression Analysis01:11

Regression Analysis

6.4K
Regression analysis is a statistical tool that describes a mathematical relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
6.4K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

3.3K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proteomic analysis of malignant ascites and its impact on ovarian cancer spheroids.

Clinical proteomics·2026
Same author

Simplification of a Three-Constant Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula to a Single-Constant Approach: The Haigis Formula.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Intraocular Lens Calculation Concept Based on Aphakic Refraction-Considerations on a Cornea Model With Two Refracting Surfaces.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same author

Response to the Letter to the Editor: Dual-Zone Keratometry for Identifying Central Radius and Corneal Asphericity.

Current eye research·2026
Same author

Variation in Manifest Subjective Refraction in a Population Screened for Refractive Surgery.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Tissue-resolved proteomic characterization of oat grains guided by metabolite MALDI mass spectrometry imaging.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Mesopic Illumination in Natural Environments: Implications for Myopia Research.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Axial Length Growth Reference Curves and LMS Parameters for Japanese Children and Adolescents Aged 4-20 Years: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Effect of Switching Myopia Control Strategies on Axial Elongation in Children with Poor Response to Highly Aspherical Lenslet Therapy.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Role of Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration and Age in Night Vision Disturbances.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Impaired Rod-Mediated Vision is the Functional Hallmark of Ageing and Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Analytical Performance, Spatial Dynamics and Clinically Meaningful Change Thresholds for Automated Non-invasive Tear Film Assessment Using the Oculus Keratograph 5M.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.7K

Prediction of corneal back surface power - Deep learning algorithm versus multivariate regression.

Achim Langenbucher1, Nóra Szentmáry2,3, Alan Cayless4

  • 1Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|November 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A deep learning algorithm accurately predicts corneal back surface power using front surface measurements and biometrics. This method is superior to linear regression for toric lens implantation planning in cataract surgery.

Keywords:
biometrycorneal back surface powerdeep learning algorithmfeedforward multi-output networkneural networkposterior corneal astigmatism

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

155
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.7K
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

155
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Background:

  • Corneal back surface astigmatism impacts cataract surgery outcomes, particularly with toric lens implantation.
  • Accurate prediction of corneal back surface power is crucial for optimizing surgical results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a deep learning algorithm for predicting corneal back surface power.
  • To compare the deep learning model's performance against a traditional multivariate linear regression model.

Main Methods:

  • A dataset of 19,553 corneal measurements was analyzed.
  • A multi-output feedforward neural network was trained to predict corneal back surface power vector components from corneal front surface power and biometric data.
  • Model predictions were compared with those from a multivariate linear regression model.

Main Results:

  • The deep learning model demonstrated no systematic offset and narrower prediction error distributions compared to the linear model.
  • The neural network showed no trend error in predicting vector components.
  • The linear model exhibited broader error distributions and systematic trends in predictions.

Conclusions:

  • The deep learning algorithm significantly outperforms multivariate linear regression in predicting corneal back surface power.
  • This AI-driven approach enables reliable corneal back surface data prediction when direct measurements are unavailable.
  • The algorithm utilizes parameters readily available from modern biometry devices.